Real Analysis proof limits and bounded functions

kbrono
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let f be a function and p\in . Assume that a\leqf(x)\leqb near p. Prove that if L= lim f(x) as x-->p Then L\in [a,b]




The Attempt at a Solution



I want to say that because f(x) is bounded by [a,b] that automatically implies that the Limit L is also bounded by [a,b] and is therefore an element. But i have a feeling I'm supposed to make a sequence from the Sequential Characterization of Limits...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the easiest approach is to do a proof by contradiction. Assume L is not in [a,b] and derive a contradiction. Funny, I think I gave the same advice yesterday.
 
Ah ok, thank you
 
Ok here's what I tried

Basically I said assume L is not an element of [a,b] Then since f(x) is only defined on the interval [a,b]/{p} Then [a,b]/{p} contains L. Therefore L is an element of [a,b]
 
A quick an "cheap" way to do this is by subtracting L from all sides of the inequality and then take the limit of each side. Finally, rearrange the resulting inequality.
 
Thread 'Use greedy vertex coloring algorithm to prove the upper bound of χ'
Hi! I am struggling with the exercise I mentioned under "Homework statement". The exercise is about a specific "greedy vertex coloring algorithm". One definition (which matches what my book uses) can be found here: https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/HANDOUTS/greedycoloring.pdf Here is also a screenshot of the relevant parts of the linked PDF, i.e. the def. of the algorithm: Sadly I don't have much to show as far as a solution attempt goes, as I am stuck on how to proceed. I thought...

Similar threads

Back
Top