Real analysis with exponential functions; given f(x) = f'(x)

rapple
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



f(x)=f'(x) for all x in R
S.T there exists a c in R such that f(x) = c exp(x) for all x

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


By defining g = f/c, I was able to show that c= f(0)
But i am also supposed to show that c Not equal to any other value

I tried assuming that c=f(1) and cannot find a contradiction unless I plug it into f(1)=f(1).exp(1).

I am supposed to use Mean value Thm to show the contradiction. How do I go about doing it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I don't see what your point is. I assume that "S.T" means "show that" rather than the usual "such that".
You are not supposed to show that c is unique. I think you are supposed to show that if f'(x) = f(x) holds, then f(x) must be some multiple of exp(x).

How you are going to do this depends on what you know and can use. For example, using the theory of differential equations you can easily show that the equation f'(x) = f(x) with f(0) = c has a unique solution.
 


CompuChip said:
I don't see what your point is. I assume that "S.T" means "show that" rather than the usual "such that".
You are not supposed to show that c is unique. I think you are supposed to show that if f'(x) = f(x) holds, then f(x) must be some multiple of exp(x).

How you are going to do this depends on what you know and can use. For example, using the theory of differential equations you can easily show that the equation f'(x) = f(x) with f(0) = c has a unique solution.

This is in real analysis in the section on exponential functions. So I can't use differential equations.

The only way, I suppose, is to arrive at a contradiction if c not= f(0).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top