Real scalar field , Action, variation, deriving EoM

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
## L(x) = L(\phi(x), \partial_{u} \phi (x) ) = -1/2 (m^{2} \phi ^{2}(x) + \partial_{u} \phi(x) \partial^{u} \phi (x))## , the Lagrange density.
## S= \int d^{4}(x) L (x) ##, the action.

## \phi -> \phi + \delta \phi ## (just shortened the notation and dropped the x dependence)

I have ## \delta S = \int d^{4} x ( -1/2( \delta (m^{2} \phi ^{2}) + \delta (\partial_{u} \phi \partial^{u} \phi )) =0 ## last equality by principle of least action .

I have ##\delta (m^{2} \phi ^{2}) = m^{2} \phi \delta \phi ## , which is fine.

I'm having problems with the next term:

##\delta (\partial_{u} \phi \partial^{u} \phi )) = \delta (\partial_{u} \phi ) \partial^{u} \phi + \partial_{u} \phi \delta ( \partial^{u} \phi ) ##

I need to show that is equal to ##\partial_{u} \phi \partial^{u} (\delta \phi) ## I am then fine with the rest of the derivation, which involves doing integration by parts on this term to 'change' ## \partial^{u} (\delta \phi) ## to ##\delta \phi## and then loosing this arbitrary variation in ##\phi## to get the equations of motion.

I am clueless how to get ## \delta (\partial_{u} \phi ) \partial^{u} \phi + \partial_{u} \phi \delta ( \partial^{u} \phi ) = \partial_{u} \phi \partial^{u} (\delta \phi) ##, any tips getting starting greatly appreciated.

Many thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
binbagsss said:
I have δ(m2ϕ2)=m2ϕδϕδ(m2ϕ2)=m2ϕδϕ\delta (m^{2} \phi ^{2}) = m^{2} \phi \delta \phi , which is fine
This is not fine, you are missing a factor of two. You are also missing the same factor of two in the other relation.

Try to use this to figure out how to solve your problem.
 
Orodruin said:
This is not fine, you are missing a factor of two. You are also missing the same factor of two in the other relation.

Try to use this to figure out how to solve your problem.

apologies that was a typo, well it cancels with the 1/2 anyway.
I don't see how it sheds any light on the issue I stated - the variation is acting seperately on ##\partial_{u}## and ##\partial^{u}##.
I think that ## \delta ( \partial_{u} \phi ) = \delta \phi' ##, were ##\phi' = \partial x_{u} \phi ##, but I don't know what is ##partial^{u} \phi ##, actually...what is ## \partial^{u} ## ? , ##\partial_{u} x = \partial / \partial x^{u} ## and ##\partial x^{u} ## can be attained by raising a index in this? but I don't really know what it is, so I don't know what ##partial^{u} \phi ## is.

Many thanks
 
bump
 
it's okay got it. thanks for the help guys :thumbup:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top