Really stuck on a Gravitation Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter grantP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation Stuck
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum energy required to raise a 1.7e3 kg vehicle from the moon's surface to a height of 5.22e6 m using gravitational potential energy equations. The initial and final potential energy values were calculated, but the user struggled with the sign conventions and arrived at an incorrect answer. After further examination, it was noted that the correct energy difference between the final and initial states should yield 3.6e9 J. The user acknowledged potential confusion due to fatigue from prolonged study. The conversation highlights the importance of careful attention to detail in physics calculations.
grantP
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What minimum energy is required to raise a 1.7e3 kg vehicle from the surface of the moon to a height of 5.22e6 m?

Homework Equations



Ep= -G(m1m2)/r

The Attempt at a Solution



Ep(initial)= -6.67e^-11(1.7e^3 x 7.35e^22)/1.74e^6 = -4789750000

Ep(final)= -6.67^-11(1.7e3 x 7.35e^22)/6.96e^6= -1197437500

I have tried subtracting the final by the initial, but I am not getting the correct answer of 3.6e^9 J.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi grantP,

grantP said:

Homework Statement



What minimum energy is required to raise a 1.7e3 kg vehicle from the surface of the moon to a height of 5.22e6 m?

Homework Equations



Ep= -G(m1m2)/r

The Attempt at a Solution



Ep(initial)= -6.67e^-11(1.7e^3 x 7.35e^22)/1.74e^6 = -4789750000

Ep(final)= -6.67^-11(1.7e3 x 7.35e^22)/6.96e^6= -1197437500

I have tried subtracting the final by the initial, but I am not getting the correct answer of 3.6e^9 J.

What are you getting? It looks to me like if you do Ep(final) - Ep(initial) you do get 3.6 x 109J.
 
oh...hmmmm i must have mixed up my signs...and doing 4 straight hours of physics homework probably didnt help...looking back at it 4 hours later I was probabaly so delerious haha.

Well anyways thanks for the help on my threads.
 
Right, I understand completely about how too much work can make you start seeing things. Glad to help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
21K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top