Rearranging equation for heat capacity

AI Thread Summary
To find the specific heat capacity of a shiny gold rock, a student measures its mass at 4.7g and the heat absorbed at 57.2 J, resulting in a temperature increase from 25°C to 57°C. The formula q = m × Cs × ΔT is used, where Cs is the specific heat capacity. The correct rearrangement of the equation to solve for Cs is necessary, and it involves isolating Cs on one side of the equation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding basic algebra for rearranging equations rather than simply substituting values. The forum encourages learning through guidance rather than providing direct answers.
FLgirl
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
1. To determine whether a shiny gold rock is actually gold, a student decides to measure its heat capacity. She first weighs the rock and finds it has a mass of 4.7g. She then finds that upon absorbtion of 57.2 J of heat, the temperature of the rock rises from 25 degree Celsius to 57 degree Celsius. Find the specific heat capacity of the substance composing the rock and determine whether the value is consistent with the rock being pure gold.
2. q = m X Cs X temperature change
Cs of gold = 0.128 J/g x Celsius

3. 4.7g X 0.128 J/g x C X 32 C = 19.25
c = 9/temperature change = J/C = 57.2/32 C
4.7g X 32 C / 57.2 J


Actual solution: 57.2 J / 4.7g X 32 CSo my question is; why is 57.2 divided by the others, when if you had brought it over from the other side, wouldn't you divide it BY 57.2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FLgirl said:
3. 4.7g X 0.128 J/g x C X 32 C = 19.25
c = 9/temperature change = J/C = 57.2/32 C
4.7g X 32 C / 57.2 J

No idea what you are doing here.

q = mc_s\Delta T

Solve for cs. Don't put numbers into the equation yet, just solve symbolically.
 
How do you do that... why are chemists so cryptic
 
Solve symbolically means rearrange so that cs will be on the left hand side of the equation and everything else will be on the right hand side.

There is nothing cryptic here, this is basic algebra that you should learn long ago. And if you have read forum rules you know we don't give final answers, we rather help you solve the problem guiding you in the right direction.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top