Rearranging terms of a conditionally convergent series

Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Why the heck will the sum of such a series going towards infinity change if its terms are re-arranged? My book omits the proof, and without it this claim makes no sense to me.

Can somebody provide an example of such a series, and maybe some light explanation (I'm way too exhausted for heavy stuff)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Wikipedia has examples
The basic idea is to shift many elements with one specific sign away ("to the right") to get the sum to diverge in the chosen direction.
 
The idea is something like this: pick your favorite number, L. Add up some positive terms until you get something that is bigger than L. Then add some negative terms until you get something that is less than L, then add some positives until you get bigger than L, and so on. Since the series is not absolutley congergent, you will always be able to do this.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top