Optimizing Truss Design for Pipeline Support: Initial Analysis Methods

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jonathanjc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Support
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on redesigning a truss structure for pipeline support and the initial analysis methods involved. The user is questioning the results of their force equilibrium calculations, specifically a perpendicular force of approximately 93 kN, which seems inconsistent with the axial load. They share their free body diagram (FBD) and express confusion over the forces involved, particularly the presumed force Fc. Other participants suggest considering additional factors like moments at the fixed point and the weight of the pipe for a more accurate analysis. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in force calculations and the potential for errors in initial assumptions.
Jonathanjc
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am attempting to redesign a truss structure for a pipeline support. I would like to find out how best to go about the initial analysis. I have attached a drawing of the pipeline in question and labelled the axial force I am working with. The pipeline is at 60° and the shaded area shows the kind of reaction the pipe will have under this kind of force. I have initially performed force equilibrium to try and find the force perpendicular to the pipe that the pipe support will need to manage. However, its given me a suspicious answer of around 93isH kN - more than the axial load and I am not convinced.

Could anyone give some advice. Whether equilibrium of forces is the wrong or right way to go for this type of problem.

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
How do u get 93?? How is ur FBD?
 
Hi,

I have attached my FBD. Fc was presumed to be 81kN which worked out and Fb came out to be -93.533kN. So the force arrow according to the FBD would flip back on its self. To me this does not look correct.

Maybe this is the wrong method to use for this problem. Or maybe I missing something. Any thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • photo.JPG
    photo.JPG
    18.8 KB · Views: 462
Hi.

Im not sure if i understand the Fc. Anyway the simplets way i think i would look at is this way(se attachement).
Else i would think you would need to know the moment at the fixed point of the pipe and length and own weight and so on the more stuff could be calculated.

Hope it helped you :)

Might be errors kinda late :)
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    14.3 KB · Views: 460
Last edited:
I was using Fc as the pipe from the initial point Fa. I guess it wasn't really necessary to do it that way.

Thanks for your input it has helped.
:)
 
Glad it helped you. :)
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...

Similar threads

Back
Top