Reduced load in a turbine generator

AI Thread Summary
A turbine generator initially delivers a 20MW load at 50Hz, which drops to 15MW, prompting the governor to open the steam valve after 0.5 seconds. During this interval, an additional 2.5MJ of energy is generated due to the power difference, increasing the total energy in the rotating parts to 82.5MJ. The initial assumption that frequency increases linearly by 3.125% is incorrect; the relationship between rotational kinetic energy and angular speed is quadratic. A more accurate approach involves using an energy conservation equation to determine the resulting frequency change. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of the relationship between energy, torque, and frequency in turbine generators.
Leannie
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A turbine generator is delivering a 20MW load at 50Hz, to a local load.; it is not connected to the grid. The load suddenly drops to 15 MW, and the governor starts to open the steam valve after 0.5s. Calculate the frequency to which the generated voltage rises, before the steam flow decreases in response to the reduced load. The stored energy in the rotating parts is 80MJ at 3000rpm.


Homework Equations



I know it a 2 pole generator from p=120f/n (don't know if this matters)
I also know reducing the torque will give a reduced power output.

power(kW)=(2∏×torque(Nm)×rpm)/60000
torque=(60000×power)/(2∏×rpm)
P=E/t

The Attempt at a Solution


During the 0.5 seconds before the steam flow is reduced there is extra power generated.
20MW-15MW=5MW
E=Pt=5MWx0.5s
E=2.5MJ

Total energy from rotating parts=80MJ+2.5MJ=82.5MJ
(2.5/80)x100=3.125% increase in energy at shaft

Will the frequency simply then be an increase of 3.125% i.e. 50+(50x0.03125)=51.5625Hz

Or is it more complicated than this, would the torque be considered?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Leannie said:
Total energy from rotating parts=80MJ+2.5MJ=82.5MJ
(2.5/80)x100=3.125% increase in energy at shaft

Will the frequency simply then be an increase of 3.125% i.e. 50+(50x0.03125)=51.5625Hz

Or is it more complicated than this, would the torque be considered?

No, it won't be a linear relationship since the relationship between rotational kinetic energy and angular speed is quadratic.

I would try an energy conservation equation instead.
 
ok thanks, i thought it wouldn't be as straight forward as that. i will try the an energy conservation equation instead.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top