Reducing Uncertainty in an Experiment to 0.012 s

  • Thread starter Thread starter bocobuff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around reducing the uncertainty in an experimental measurement from 0.03 seconds to 0.012 seconds. The original poster is exploring how to achieve this reduction through additional measurements while already having calculated the mean, standard deviation, and variance of their initial data.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to identify the measurement contributing most to the error and consider methods to improve it. The original poster questions the application of a ratio derived from the uncertainties to determine the necessary number of additional measurements.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different strategies to reduce uncertainty, including increasing the number of measurements and considering alternative measurement techniques. Some participants suggest specific numerical approaches while others emphasize the importance of addressing the sources of error directly.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has already conducted a set number of measurements (N=7) and is working within the constraints of their current experimental setup and precision limits.

bocobuff
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I want to lower the uncertainty of an experiment to 0.012 s from 0.03 s by performing x number of more measurements. I already have the mean, std dev, variance.

I know I need the factor of 0.012/0.03 somehow but I don't know where to apply it.
Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Identify the measurement that introduces the most amount of error and explore a way for improving that. I think it does little good to reduce uncertainty of quantities you already know with sufficient precision.
 
That's not really what i was asking...
So say I already took N=7 measurements and have the best estimated uncertainty for the mean time, which is 0.03.
Now I want to reduce that number to 0.012 by taking some new number of measurements.
Wouldn't I just use the ratio 0.03/0.012 = 2.5 and then multiply that by 7?
So I would need to take 17.5, or 18, measurements to reduce my uncertainty to 0.012...?
 
If it is something like timing something, then yes you can increase the number of oscillations say linearly as you suggest.

If your original modeling for the error took 200 ms as your stop watch reaction time and you want to achieve a 12 ms error, then figure that 17 oscillations will afford you that precision.

However you can also consider getting a laser sensor that attacks the problem with the notion that the error introduced is smaller to begin with.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K