Regression rate of fuel in rocket nozzle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the stability and instability of a system based on the parameter n, with stability for n < 1 and instability for n > 1. Participants explore the integration of the equation related to time growth, specifically addressing the presence of ln(δpc) in the left-hand side. The integration leads to the conclusion that y can be expressed as y = exp(-Ct), indicating an exponential decay. A key point raised is how to determine the time required for y to change from y0 to 2y0, which is calculated as t = (1/C) * ln(2). The conversation emphasizes the relationship between the constants and the time growth dynamics in the context of the equations presented.
TimeRip496
Messages
249
Reaction score
5
upload_2017-12-14_12-52-45.png

So we have: stability for n < 1
instability for n > 1
upload_2017-12-14_12-53-43.png


I assume to get the time growth, I have to integrate the above first eqn. However I also get ln(δpc) at the LHS from the integrating. However the above equation for time growth removed that ln(δpc) and thus I can't seem to get past this part.

Source: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/aeronau...pring-2012/lecture-notes/MIT16_50S12_lec9.pdf
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-14_12-52-45.png
    upload_2017-12-14_12-52-45.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 979
  • upload_2017-12-14_12-53-43.png
    upload_2017-12-14_12-53-43.png
    7.2 KB · Views: 951
Physics news on Phys.org
When ##\frac{1}{y}\frac{dy}{dt}=-C## then integrating both sides leads to ## \ln(y) = -Ct ## (neglecting the constant of integration)
Taking the exponential of the left side leads to ## \exp(\ln(y)) = e^{\ln(y)} = y ##
Taking the exponential of both sides leads to ##y = \exp(-Ct) =\frac{1}{e^{Ct}}##
hope this helps.
 
bigfooted said:
When ##\frac{1}{y}\frac{dy}{dt}=-C## then integrating both sides leads to ## \ln(y) = -Ct ## (neglecting the constant of integration)
Taking the exponential of the left side leads to ## \exp(\ln(y)) = e^{\ln(y)} = y ##
Taking the exponential of both sides leads to ##y = \exp(-Ct) =\frac{1}{e^{Ct}}##
hope this helps.
Thanks I get this part. However the one shown on the pdf does not have the exponential for the time growth equation. How did they arrive at the above equation while getting rid of the exponential?
 
well, how much time does it take for ##y## to change from ##y_0## at ##t=0## to say ##2y_0##?

at ##t=0## we have ##y=\exp(0) = 1 ##, so ##y_0=1##
and at time t, we have from the equation ##\ln(y) = Ct## (I make it positive here because your equation has a negative constant):
##t = \frac{1}{C} \cdot \ln(2) ##

so to double ##y##, it takes ##t = \frac{1}{C} \cdot \ln(2) ## seconds, with a scaling factor for doubling (or tripling or whatever) of ## \frac{1}{C}##

hope this helps...
 
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Back
Top