Related Rates of a triangle angle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the rates of change of an angle and the sides of a right triangle as they vary over time. The user begins by expressing the angle θ in terms of the tangent function and seeks verification of their approach using inverse trigonometric functions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of applying the chain rule and quotient rule to derive the relationship between the derivatives. It concludes with a confirmation that the final expression for the rate of change of the angle, dθ/dt, is correctly derived as cos²(θ) * (x(dy/dt) - y(dx/dt))/x². Overall, the discussion provides a clear method for solving related rates problems involving triangles.
courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
Hello all

Just came across a few questions on related rates and would like some verification on whether I am doing these correctly:

1. Let \theta be an acute angle in a right triangle, and let x and y, respectively be the sides adjacent and opposite of \theta. Suppose that x and y vary with time? How are \frac{d\theta}{dt} \frac{dx}{dt} \frac{dy}{dt} related? Well I set up a relationship where tan \theta = \frac{y}{x} So \theta = \arctan(\frac{y}{x}) Hence \frac{d\theta}{dt} = d(\arctan(\frac{y}{x}) Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So far. Do you know the derivatives for inverse trig functions?

If not, it might be better to set your equation up like this:

tan \theta=\frac{y}{x}

\frac{d}{dt}(tan \theta)=\frac{d}{dt} (\frac{y}{x})

Find the derivative for the left side (remembering to apply the chain rule). Find the derivative for the right side using the quotient rule. Isolate \frac{d \theta}{dt} on one side of the equation and simplify.

You get the same answer either way (at least, you do if you know your trig identities). I'm not sure the arctangent saves you any steps and the inverse functions are hard to memorize on top of everything else you have to remember (unless you're doing the inverse trig functions, in which case you're probably expected to remember them for at least a couple of weeks).
 
ok so \frac{d}{dt}(tan \theta)=\frac{d}{dt} (\frac{y}{x}) and this equals sec^{2}x \frac{d\theta}{dt} = \frac{x(\frac{dy}{dt}) + y(\frac{dx}{dt})}{x^2} So do I just solve for \frac{d \theta}{dt} from this equation?

Thanks :smile:
 
Last edited:
Yes.

But, to isolate \frac{d \theta}{dt}, you need to multiply both sides by \frac{1}{sec^2 \theta}, which happens to be cos^2 \theta

Your typical related rates problem for this will give you your intial x and y positions, or one of them and your angle (from the two provided, you can find the third). They'll also give you your two velocities, which are the derivatives of your position components. Once you have all 5, you plug into the equation to find out how fast your angle is changing.
 
courtrigrad said:
ok so \frac{d}{dt}(tan \theta)=\frac{d}{dt} (\frac{y}{x}) and this equals sec^{2}x \frac{d\theta}{dt} = \frac{x(\frac{dy}{dt}) + y(\frac{dx}{dt})}{x^2} So do I just solve for \frac{d \theta}{dt} from this equation?

Thanks :smile:

I believe the above should be

sec^{2}\theta \frac{d\theta}{dt} = \frac{x(\frac{dy}{dt}) - y(\frac{dx}{dt})}{x^2}
 
ok so the final solution would be: \frac{d\theta}{dt} = cos^2\theta \frac{x(\frac{dy}{dt}) - y(\frac{dx}{dt})}{x^2}

is this right?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top