Relating Point Charges for a Net Zero Force

AI Thread Summary
To achieve a net zero electrostatic force on point charge +Q at x = +2a due to point charges q1 and q2, the magnitudes and signs of q1 and q2 must be equal and opposite, positioned symmetrically around charge +Q. When +Q is placed at x = +3a, the relationship between q1 and q2 remains the same, but the distances from +Q to each charge must be recalculated to ensure the forces still balance. The electrostatic force on +Q from each charge can be determined using Coulomb's Law, which states that the force is proportional to the product of the charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. The superposition principle allows for the calculation of the net force by vectorially adding the forces from q1 and q2. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
cuddlylover
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Point charges q1 and q2 lie on the x-axis at points x = -a and x = +a, respectively. (a) How
must q1 and q2 be related for the net electrostatic force on point charge +Q, placed at x = +a=2,
to be zero? (b) Repeat (a) but with point charge +Q now placed at x = +3a=2.

Can someone help me with this i am a bit lost.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the electrostatic force on Q due to charge q1? and due to q2??

Then apply the superposition principle.
 
Infinitum said:
What is the electrostatic force on Q due to charge q1? and due to q2??

Then apply the superposition principle.
If someone could go into more detail on this would be a big help
 
Electrostatic force(Coulomb's Law) : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb's_law

Superposition principle states that electrostatic force between any two charges is independent of other charges. The force on any charged particle due is given by the vector addition of the force due to each charge.

{F_{net}} = {F_1} + {F_2} + {F_3} + ... + {F_n}
 
cuddlylover said:
If someone could go into more detail on this would be a big help
That's not how it works here. Infinitum's given you two nudges. Now you need to step up and show some initiative on solving this problem yourself first.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top