Relation between charge and voltage in spherical capacitors

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between charge and voltage in spherical capacitors, exploring various equations and scenarios involving capacitors, dielectrics, and the effects of grounding. Participants examine theoretical and practical aspects of capacitance, voltage, and charge distribution in different configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using the equation C=Q/V to find the charge on the plates of a spherical capacitor, while another proposes using V=Q/r * 1/4ε0∏, questioning which is more appropriate.
  • There is a discussion about the capacitance formula for spherical capacitors and whether the dielectric constant affects the capacitance similarly to parallel plate capacitors.
  • Some participants clarify that when a dielectric is present, the permittivity used should be ε instead of ε0.
  • A scenario involving a van de Graaff generator is presented, where one plate is charged and the other is grounded, raising questions about charge and voltage distribution between the plates.
  • Concerns are raised about whether the charge on the grounded plate will equal the charge on the charged plate and how this relates to circuit behavior.
  • Participants discuss the implications of connecting the two plates with a wire after charging, questioning if this configuration can be treated as a capacitor for energy calculations.
  • There is a request for clarification on what value of capacitance (C) should be used in energy calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate equations to use for calculating charge and voltage in spherical capacitors, as well as the effects of dielectrics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of grounding and charge distribution in specific scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various equations and concepts, but there are unresolved assumptions about the conditions under which these equations apply, particularly in scenarios involving dielectrics and grounding.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and professionals interested in electrostatics, capacitor theory, and the behavior of charged objects in different configurations.

abdo799
Messages
168
Reaction score
4
1-If we had a spherical capacitor and the voltage across it is 1000 V, I need to know the charge on every plate, I know 2 ways to solve this either using C=Q/V or V=Q/r * 1/4ε0∏. So, which one should I use, and why?
2-Another thing, according to hyperphysics the formula for the capacitance of the spherical capacitor = 4∏ε0/ (1/a - 1/b). Does that mean that the dielectric constant of the dielectric has no effect like parallel plates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2. Usually we look at spheres with nothing in between, hence the ##\epsilon_0##. With a dielectric you would have to use ##\epsilon##.

1. With plate you mean spherical surface ? In your case I would use the first eqn. Since you already found the hyperphysics expression for C: just above there is V in terms of Q, though. A bit more straightforward.

All this assuming you are comfortable with Gauss' law.
 
BvU said:
2. Usually we look at spheres with nothing in between, hence the ##\epsilon_0##. With a dielectric you would have to use ##\epsilon##.

1. With plate you mean spherical surface ? In your case I would use the first eqn. Since you already found the hyperphysics expression for C: just above there is V in terms of Q, though. A bit more straightforward.

All this assuming you are comfortable with Gauss' law.
ok, i know from my other post ( chemical engineering thing) that you are a physicist which is really cool because i wanted to be one, about your answer, is the second wrong if i used it in this case?
if you considered a van de graaff generator , where the sphere was one plate and then it was covered with dielectric then we put another metal sphere on it as the other plate ( we ground this plate).(forming a spherical capacitor)
If the van de graaff generator had a radius of 1 m and put a charge on the sphere of 0.001 coulomb using the second equation the voltage on the sphere will be about 9 MV.
will the other plate gain the same voltage or the same charge ?
In my first case i was almost sure that we have to use C=Q/V because the setup was a capacitor and a battery, a classical circuit. In the case i just wrote , something is different, we charge only one plate with positive charge ( the van-de graaff generator) and the other plate will gain the extra negative charge from the ground.
 
Last edited:
hi abdo799! :smile:
abdo799 said:
I know 2 ways to solve this either using C=Q/V or V=Q/r * 1/4ε0∏. So, which one should I use, and why?
2-Another thing, according to hyperphysics the formula for the capacitance of the spherical capacitor = 4∏ε0/ (1/a - 1/b). Does that mean that the dielectric constant of the dielectric has no effect like parallel plates?

for a spherical capacitor with dielectric constant ε:

D = -Q/4πr2

E = -Q/ε4πr2

V = ∫ab E dx = [Q/ε4πr]ab

C = Q/V
 
tiny-tim said:
hi abdo799! :smile:


for a spherical capacitor with dielectric constant ε:

D = -Q/4πr2

E = -Q/ε4πr2

V = ∫ab E dx = [Q/ε4πr]ab

C = Q/V

i already know this derivation , but i really need an answer to my reply to the first reply , thanks
 
hi abdo799! :smile:
abdo799 said:
if you considered a van de graaff generator , where the sphere was one plate and then it was covered with dielectric then we put another metal sphere on it as the other plate ( we ground this plate).(forming a spherical capacitor)
If the van de graaff generator had a radius of 1 m and put a charge on the sphere of 0.001 coulomb using the second equation the voltage on the sphere will be about 9 MV.
will the other plate gain the same voltage or the same charge ?
In my first case i was almost sure that we have to use C=Q/V because the setup was a capacitor and a battery, a classical circuit. In the case i just wrote , something is different, we charge only one plate with positive charge ( the van-de graaff generator) and the other plate will gain the extra negative charge from the ground.

if the capacitor is part of a circuit, it's the same (and opposite) charge

when you change the voltage across any capacitor in a circuit, the total charge on the two plates will be the same as before :wink:

if the capacitor is not part of a circuit (ie it's not really acting as a capacitor), eg if you charge one sphere and bring it near an uncharged sphere (unconnected to it), then the positive and negative charges on the uncharged sphere will redistribute so that the opposite charge faces the first sphere, and the "same" charge retreats to the other side

of course, if the first plate surrounds the second so that the distance between them is constant, then there's no "nearer" and "further", and the charge in the second plate will have no reason to redistribute itself (it can't retreat to the inside surface of the second plate because the charge there must be zero from gauss's law since there's no charge inside it)

if the second plate surrounds the first, a gaussian surface in the middle of the second plate shows that the opposite charge on the inside surface must be equal to that of the inner plate: the "same" charge will retreat to the outside surface of the second plate if not grounded, and to the ground if grounded (i think that's what you're asking about?)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
tiny-tim said:
hi abdo799! :smile:


if the capacitor is part of a circuit, it's the same (and opposite) charge

when you change the voltage across any capacitor in a circuit, the total charge on the two plates will be the same as before :wink:

if the capacitor is not part of a circuit (ie it's not really acting as a capacitor), eg if you charge one sphere and bring it near an uncharged sphere (unconnected to it), then the positive and negative charges on the uncharged sphere will redistribute so that the opposite charge faces the first sphere, and the "same" charge retreats to the other side

of course, if the first plate surrounds the second so that the distance between them is constant, then there's no "nearer" and "further", and the charge in the second plate will have no reason to redistribute itself (it can't retreat to the inside surface of the second plate because the charge there must be zero from gauss's law since there's no charge inside it)

if the second plate surrounds the first, a gaussian surface in the middle of the second plate shows that the opposite charge on the inside surface must be equal to that of the inner plate: the "same" charge will retreat to the outside surface of the second plate if not grounded, and to the ground if grounded (i think that's what you're asking about?)

Last question please,
After we charge the whole thing , and the external sphere gained the extra charge , then we connect both sphere with a wire ( kinda like a capacitor discharge) the electrons will flow from the negative sphere to the positive one ,can i consider it now a capacitor ? can i use (1/2 c V^2) to calculate energy ?
 
abdo799 said:
Last question please,
After we charge the whole thing , and the external sphere gained the extra charge , then we connect both sphere with a wire ( kinda like a capacitor discharge) the electrons will flow from the negative sphere to the positive one ,can i consider it now a capacitor ? can i use (1/2 c V^2) to calculate energy ?

What value of C are you suggesting should be used?
 
sophiecentaur said:
What value of C are you suggesting should be used?

C=4ε∏/(1/a-1/b)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K