I Relations & Functions: Types, Examples, Homomorphism

mikeeey
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Hello every one .
A relation ( is a subset of the cartesian product between Xand Y) in math between two sets has spatial
types 1-left unique ( injective)
2- right unique ( functional )
3- left total
4- right total (surjective)
May question is 1- a function ( map ) is a relation that is
a- right unique
b- left total
I'm asking if there is a relation ( not function ) that is ( left total) and ( right total ) then what would is be called ? In the sense that the two set are infinite set is there and example
My second question if we have two group structures and we want a relation between them , why does always the relation is function ( homomorphism ) ? Is there a relation that is left total and right total between the two structures ?
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Does your x-total imply x-unique? If not, you have pretty many possibilities to define non-functional relations (finite or not).
The same goes for group homomorphisms. Simply define a relation ##R## (functional or not, finite or not) with ##(a,1) \in R## for an ##a \neq 1##, the neutral element.
 
No , there is no uniqueness
A relation which is not function e.g. X^2+Y^2=1 , this is between two sets
Now if a set with a structure ( space ) is there relation( not map ) between the two space or groups ? And how would it look like ?
 
Simply take a projection, e.g. ##ℝ^2 → ℝ## with ##(x,y) = x## and turn the arrow, so ##((x,y),x)## becomes ##(x,(x,y))##.
But this is only one example out of many. Relation means, you are not restricted to any other rule than to draw many arrows, i.e. in case of totality ##R \subseteq X \times Y## such that ##∀ x \in X \; ∀ y \in Y \; ∃ (x,y) \in R##. Relate whatever you want to.
There is a reason why we talk about functions. Relations are simply too many and too arbitrary.
 
Thank you very much , now i understand why we choose functions to relate spaces , and alao i think functions appear in nature of physics a lot ( by means function decribe the nature ) and easy to handle because we know how elements are related .
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Back
Top