Relationship between charge carriers per unit volume and resistance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between charge carrier density and electrical resistance, emphasizing that an increase in charge carriers per unit volume leads to a decrease in resistance. More charge carriers facilitate the flow of current, which reduces resistance, aligning with the concept of inverse proportionality. Participants clarify that lower resistance allows for higher drift velocity of charge carriers, enabling faster movement through the conductor. The conversation highlights the confusion surrounding these concepts but ultimately reinforces the principle that higher charge density correlates with lower resistance and increased current flow. Understanding these relationships is crucial for grasping fundamental electrical circuit behavior.
tobytoby123
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Why is the number of charge carriers per unit volume is inversely proportional to resistance?If there is more charges carrier, it doesn't increase the collision between free electron which causes in increase of resistance?sorry for my unclear concept of Electricity circuit.I hope there will be someone to help.:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you confident about what is meant by 'inversely proportional'?
More charge carriers will reduce resistance... do you see it?
 
when the number of charge carrier per unit volume increase, the resistance decrease.Is that means inversely proportional?I don't understand why more charge carrier will reduce resistance @@ because it helps transferring charge?sorry i am really confused.
 
Also, is the lower the resistance, the higher the Drift Velocity?this also makes me confused.
 
Low resistance means that a high current can flow.
Current is the amount of charge (charge carriers) flowing per second so basically more charge carriers means more current which means LOW resistance.
This is a very much simplified explanation... hope it helps
 
thx very much:)it helps a lot:)but if higher the drift velocity, is that mean low resistance?because if low resistance, the charged particles can pass through faster.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
View full post »

Similar threads

Work Done per Unit Charge vs Current
Replies
10
Views
5K
I Why does increasing resistance in a conductor decrease power dissipation?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Current at a Junction: Does Current Density Change?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Question on relationship between drift velocity and resistance
Replies
1
Views
11K
Relationship between Electric Field and Potentential
Replies
2
Views
1K
Understanding Potential Difference: Work Done per Unit Charge?
Replies
42
Views
9K
B How is surface charge accumulated?
Replies
36
Views
6K
Find drift velocity of the current carriers in the copper strip
Replies
19
Views
4K
Electric potential energy between charge and moving magnet
Replies
7
Views
2K
The relationship between percent and per unit impedance
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top