Relationship between commutators and observables

playoff
Messages
80
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Suppose A^ and B^ are linear quantum operators representing two observables A and B of a physical system. What must be true of the commutator [A^,B^] so that the system can have definite values of A and B simultaneously?

Homework Equations


I will use the bra-ket notation for the inner product (sorry for lack of latex)

The Attempt at a Solution


So I assumed that for observables A and B to have a definite value, <psi*|A^|psi> and <psi*|B^|psi> have to be normalizable. Call a and b normalization constants of <psi*|A^|psi> and <psi*|B^|psi> respectively, then: a<psi*|A^|psi> = b<psi*|B^|psi> = 1.

Here I made my sloppy assumption that the equation above implies that A^ and B^ are proportional (A^=(b/a)*A^), which leads to that the commutator must be zero.

I made this assumption as both A^ and B^ are being "operated" by the same inner product, so the bolded equation can be reduced to aA^=bB^. Is this an assumption I can make?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation that you wrote down doesn't lead to any relation between ##\hat{A}## and ##\hat{B}##, since, as long as the expectation values are nonzero, we can always find ##a## and ##b## as the reciprocal of the corresponding expectation values. The values of ##a## and ##b## are unrelated.

The key here is to understand what "definite value" means in this context. For a system to have a definite value of an observable, it must be in an eigenstate of the observable. The problem wants you to figure out what this means when you have two observables
 
  • Like
Likes playoff
@fzero: Yes, I had a totally wrong understanding of a definite value. It makes sense that an operator has a definite value if the normalized wavefunction is its eigenfunction, thus the inner product becomes the eigenvalue.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top