Relationship between distance and gravitational force

AI Thread Summary
Doubling the distance between two masses results in a gravitational force that is one-quarter of the original force, while tripling the distance reduces the force to one-ninth. Halving the distance increases the gravitational force to four times the original. The discussion highlights the inverse relationship between distance and gravitational force, emphasizing the importance of understanding the gravitational force equation, F = GmM/r². Participants also discuss graphing techniques, with confusion around the term "straighten" versus "linearize" to analyze data trends. Clarification is sought on the relationship between centripetal acceleration and gravitational force in a theoretical lab context.
Davidjanas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If you double the distance between to masses, the gravitational force between them would:____

If you triple the distance between two masses, the gravitational force between them would be _______ the original force

If you Halve the distance between two masses the gravitational force between them would be ________ the original force

Homework Equations



None I guess?

The Attempt at a Solution



During this lab I found the inverse relationship between the distance and the gravitational force.

I think that that means the gravitational force would quarter if you double the distance between two masses. I'm not sure at all though.

PS: How do you straighten a graph that looks like this [PLAIN]http://www.monastyr.info/wp-content/uploads/cc/Inverse_Functions2.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Davidjanas said:

Homework Equations



None I guess?
How about: F = \frac{GmM}{r^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



During this lab I found the inverse relationship between the distance and the gravitational force.
Just out of curiosity, how are you doing this in a lab?

I think that that means the gravitational force would quarter if you double the distance between two masses. I'm not sure at all though.
I think you would be more sure if you look at the equation for gravitational force (above).

PS: How do you straighten a graph that looks like this [PLAIN]http://www.monastyr.info/wp-content/uploads/cc/Inverse_Functions2.jpg[/QUOTE]First of all, what does this have to do with gravity? This is a pressure/volume graph. Second, what do you mean by "straighten" it? Why do you want to straighten it?

AM
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just out of curiosity, how are you doing this in a lab?
It's not a lab we're actually doing, it's purely theoretical. We found the the centripetal acceleration of satellites's based on their radii and Periods, using this data we have to graph the results, which show that the greater the Radius the slower the centripetal acceleration.

Using what I've found out from that relationship I have to answer the questions. However I'm not sure I fully understood the relationship.

First of all, what does this have to do with gravity? This is a pressure/volume graph. Second, what do you mean by "straighten" it? Why do you want to straighten it?

I know that the units are not correct, I'm trying to explain the trend. Is that an inverse exponential? I'm not sure.

You may be more familiarized with the term "Linearize", although my teacher says to "straighten" I must do this to find the slope of the line of the data
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top