Relationship between electric energy and force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a homework problem involving β decay, where electrons and positrons are emitted simultaneously from two sources. Participants express confusion about the relationship between kinetic energy and electric force, questioning why the initial energy is provided if the final energy is assumed to be zero. The electric force between the oppositely charged particles, which are 10 cm apart and moving away from each other, is emphasized as a crucial factor in the calculations. Clarifications are sought regarding the relevance of potential energy in the context of the problem. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of applying energy conservation principles in particle physics scenarios.
NotADuckFan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


One of the three types of radioactive decay is "β decay", during which protons decay into neutrons or viceversa, emitting either electrons (β) or positrons (β+) at high velocity as a result. In one experiment, a β source and β+ source are placed 10 cm apart from each other. At a certain time, both sources decay simultaneously, with the electron being emitted along the xaxis and the positron being emitted along the yaxis (i.e. the paths of the two particles are at a right angle). Both particles are emitted with 5 keV(kiloelectron volts) of kinetic energy and start on the xaxis. What is magnitude and direction of the total force on each particle? (Do not ignore electric force, assume electrons and positrons have the same mass.)

Homework Equations


ΔE=Ui+Uf=−∫F.dr=>F=−∇E

The Attempt at a Solution


I attempted to solve this using conservation of energy. Initially, we have both kinetic and potential energy. Kinetic energy is given to us and we can find electric potential energy. I'm assuming the total final energy (kinetic + potential) is zero since Vf = 0 and Uf = 0 (since distance between the two particles gets "infinitely" long). I then tried to use the equation

ΔE=Ui+Uf=−∫F.dr=>F=−∇E

But I'm not sure how this would help. I feel like I'm missing something. The fact that the question states "don't ignore electric force" makes me think I have to use it, but then if I'm using the electric force formula what's the point of having the initial energy? Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello NaDF, welcome to PF :smile:

I have a hard time imagining what is described here. Are these e+ and e- shot off away from each other, or towards each other ?

And why do you think the final energy would be zero ? There's 10 keV of energy and energy can be converted into other forms, but it doesn't just go away.

(There's also 1020 keV/c2 of rest mass -- a big POOF o0) if the two happen to meet) .
 
BvU said:
Hello NaDF, welcome to PF :smile:

I have a hard time imagining what is described here. Are these e+ and e- shot off away from each other, or towards each other ?

And why do you think the final energy would be zero ? There's 10 keV of energy and energy can be converted into other forms, but it doesn't just go away.

(There's also 1020 keV/c2 of rest mass -- a big POOF o0) if the two happen to meet) .

The charges are moving away from each other. This is all the question states, there aren't any other information given. But apparently it's supposed to be a fairly straightforward calculation...
 
WEll, I didn't pick that up from the wording :smile:

So you have two opposite charges, 10 cm apart. What's to stop you from calculating the electric force between them ?
 
BvU said:
WEll, I didn't pick that up from the wording :smile:

So you have two opposite charges, 10 cm apart. What's to stop you from calculating the electric force between them ?

Nothing is stopping me from calculating the electric force, I'm just not sure why the kinetic energy is given. This chapter is about potential and potential energy so I have to use those somehow... o_O
 
I see what you mean. You feel some obligation towards the sadist that thought up these exercises, eh :wink:

So why the blabla about e+ and e- and not, for example two pea shooters instead of these scary radioactive sources ?
What would be the force on each of the peas given they have a kinetic energy of 16 GeV each ? ( approx 0.1 gram at 5 m/s :smile: )
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top