Relationship between free energy and the equilibrium constant

AI Thread Summary
The relationship between free energy and the equilibrium constant is defined by the equation ΔG° = -RT ln K. Experimental data shows that the Kb for NH3(aq) varies with temperature, with specific values provided for 283 K, 293 K, and 303 K. For moderate temperature ranges, ΔS° and ΔH° can be considered approximately temperature independent. A user attempts to derive a linear equation relating ln Kb to ΔH and ΔS, but seeks clarification on the correct axes for their plot. The discussion emphasizes the need for proper categorization of questions and understanding of thermodynamic relationships.
chazgurl4life
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
The relationship between free energy and the equilibrium constant is

Go = -RT ln K

By measuring the pH at various temperatures, the Kb for NH3(aq) was found to be temperature dependent, yielding the following values:

temperature (K) Kb
283 1.34 X 10-5
293 1.42 X 10-5
303 1.50 X 10-5

Over moderate temperature ranges (ranges less than 100 K degrees) both deltaSo and deltaHo can be considered approximately temperature independent. By plotting the available information appropriately, obtain estimates for deltaSo and delayHo for the reaction:


ok so i figured out that my y=mx+b equation should loook lik:

lnKb=delta H/R(gas constnt) - delta S/r

bbut what is my x-axis and y axis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. This question belongs in the Coursework & Homework section of the forums. Henceforth, please post such questions there (and use a more descriptive title).

2.
ok so i figured out that my y=mx+b equation should loook lik:

lnKb=delta H/R(gas constnt) - delta S/r
That's not right. What is the relationship between \Delta G_0~,~~\Delta H_0 and \Delta S_0 ?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top