Relationship between several operators and their eigenvectors.

aop12
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


operators: K=LM and [L,M]=1

α is an eigenvector of K with eigenvalue λ.

Show that x=Lα and y=Mα are also eigenvectors of K and also find their eigenvalues.


Homework Equations


K=LM
[L,M]=1
Kα=λα


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried, but its not even worth putting up here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to show that x eigenvector of K which means Kx=λ'x for some λ'.

Kx=KLα = LMLα
Try to modify that equation (using [L,M]=1) until you can use Kα=λα and simplify.
 
So, am I doing this right?
Starting with: Kx=λ'x where x=Lα

Kx=KLα=LMLα ===> using K=LM

=L(LM-1)α=LLMα-Lα ===>using [L,M]=1

=LKα-Lα
Now going back to Kx=λ'x
LKα-Lα=λ'Lα

LKα=(λ'+1)Lα

Finally,

Kα=L-1(λ'+1)Lα

since λ'+1 is a constant,

Kα=(λ'+1)L-1
Kα=(λ'+1)α

so λ'=λ-1.

is that correct?
 
Last edited:
aop12 said:
So, am I doing this right?
Starting with: Kx=λ'x where x=Lα

Kx=KLα=LMLα ===> using K=LM

=L(LM-1)α=LLMα-Lα ===>using [L,M]=1

=LKα-Lα
...

Good start! And correct finish!

But I would have continued like this:

= Lλα - Lα since Kα = λα.

= (λ - 1)Lα since λ commutes with the operator L.

Hence K(Lα) = (λ - 1)Lα, showing that Lα is an eigenvector of operator K with eigenvalue (λ - 1).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top