Relationship between work and kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a block of ice sliding down a frictionless ramp while being pulled by a worker. The key points include calculating the work done by the worker's force, which is determined to be 25 J. The increase in kinetic energy of the block is noted as 80 J, but the confusion arises regarding how much greater the kinetic energy would have been without the rope. The relationship between work done and change in kinetic energy is emphasized, with the conclusion that the net downward force affects the overall kinetic energy. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding these concepts in solving physics problems effectively.
lemonpie
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block of ice slides down a frictionless ramp at angle q = 50° while an ice worker pulls on the block (via a rope) with a force that has a magnitude of 50 N and is directed up the ramp. As the block slides through distance d = 0.50 m along the ramp, its kinetic energy increases by 80 J. How much greater would its kinetic energy have been if the rope had not been attached to the block?
http://www.lowellphysics.org/beta/Textbook%20Resources/Chapter%207.%20Kinetic%20Energy%20and%20Work/Problems/c07x7_11.xform_files/nw0315-n.gif

Homework Equations


W = Fd, delta K = Kf - Ki

The Attempt at a Solution


I found W = Fd = (50)(0.5) = 25 J. Then I tried to figure out the kinetic energy at the top and bottom of the ramp, but I got stuck because the mass of the block wasn't given. Then I checked the back of the book and found that the answer to the increase in kinetic energy was actually 25 J, and in some vague way this makes sense to me, but not totally, and not in a way I would have been able to figure out on my own. Can someone give me some helpful words to explain this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work done = change in KE.
From this find the net down ward force (F-Fr).
 
rl.bhat said:
Work done = change in KE.

thanks. i feel stupid.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top