Relationships between Current, Voltage and Resistance

AI Thread Summary
When the sliding contact S of the rheostat is moved from X to Y, the resistance increases, leading to a decrease in current (I) and voltage (V). The initial conclusion that voltage increases with resistance was incorrect; both current and voltage actually decrease as resistance rises. This is clarified by Ohm's Law, which indicates that voltage (V) and current (I) are inversely proportional when resistance (R) increases. The relationship can be understood as V and I maintaining a constant ratio, meaning that as one increases, the other must decrease. Therefore, the correct interpretation is that both current and voltage decrease as resistance increases.
fictionistruth
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Based on the diagram attached, how do the values of current, I and voltage, V change when the sliding contact S of the rheostat is slowly moved from X to Y?

Homework Equations


Ohm's Law
R=V/I

The Attempt at a Solution


I used Ohm's Law to solve this question. My answer was: I decreases and V increases, because R is directly proportional to V and inversely proportional to I. As S is moved from X to Y, the resistance increases. I deduced that the voltage increases as resistance increases, and current decreases as resistance increases.

However my answer was wrong; the correct answer was: I decreases and V decreases. I don't understand why the voltage would decrease as resistance was increased because Ohm's Law clearly shows that R is directly proportional to V. Can anyone please explain why?
 

Attachments

  • 2013-07-20 22.22.34.jpg
    2013-07-20 22.22.34.jpg
    21.5 KB · Views: 512
Physics news on Phys.org
V and inversely proportional to I.
That is not true. You can re-write Ohm's law as RI=V. As you can see, V and I are proportional to each other. Another way to read R=V/I is "V and I have a constant ratio" (which is the same as "are proportional to each other").

As S is moved from X to Y, the resistance increases.
The total resistance increases, indeed.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top