Relative Brightness of A-E, C+D

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relative brightness of five light bulbs connected in various configurations. Light bulbs C and D are in series, while C and D are in parallel with E, and A and B are in parallel. Assuming identical bulbs, the brightness is proportional to the current squared. A, B, and E are expected to have the same brightness due to their parallel connection, while C and D share brightness but may differ from A, B, and E. The conclusion is that A, B, and E are equal in brightness to C and D, contingent on identical wattages.
Empire
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
There are five light bulbs. Light bulb C and D are in a series connection. C and D are in a parallel connection with E. Light Bulb A and B are in a parallel connection. The two parallel connections are wired in a series connection. What would be their relative brightness? I'm thinking that A=B=E=C+D

********************
|----power---------------|
|*******************|
|*******************|
|**|--A--|***|-C-D-|**|
|---|****|----|****|---|
***|--B--|***|--E--|***
********************
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First you have to make at least one assumption. I would assume that the light bulbs are identical, and that "brightness" means "total power emited". Then brightness ~ I2.

I disagree with your result (assuming I did it correctly). You need to use the voltage and current divider to examine this circuit.
 
Last edited:


The relative brightness of A, B, E, C, and D would depend on the individual wattage or power rating of each light bulb. However, in general, A, B, and E would have the same brightness because they are in a parallel connection. C and D, being in a series connection, would have the same brightness as each other but potentially different from A, B, and E. Therefore, the relative brightness of A, B, E, C, and D would be A=B=E=C+D. However, this could change if the individual wattage of each light bulb is different.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top