Relative Velocities: Engineering Mechanics Dynamics - Hibbeler

  • Thread starter Thread starter serverxeon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relative
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem from "Engineering Mechanics Dynamics" by Hibbeler, specifically regarding the application of relative velocity equations. Participants express confusion about the correct interpretation of an equation that involves an intermediate frame attached to point B, which is rotating at an angular velocity, ω. Concerns are raised about the placement of ω in the textbook's solution, suggesting it may not align with the frame's rotation about point B. The consensus is that ω should be consistent throughout the rotating frame. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying concepts of relative motion in dynamics.
serverxeon
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
2icbqzt.jpg

2hd1sg3.jpg

Source: Engineering Mechanics Dynamics - Hibbeler
----------------------
My friends and I have discussed and have no idea how to solve.
So we looked at the textbook.

We were told to use this equation.

2vhzy94.jpg


In this equation, A/B means 'A respect to B'
Also, the equation is derived based on an intermediate frame attached to point B, which is rotating at \omega.

In the textbook's solution below, however, the intermediate frame is attached to point B, but the \omega is to the right of the frame (the centre of the prescribed circle). The \omega is no longer about the frame through point B.

Hence, we have our suspicious of the textbook solution.
Anyway has got any idea if we're wrong, or is the textbook wrong?

--------------------
2igejgk.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ω is the same everywhere in a rotating frame.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top