Relative Velocity problem - stuck, lacking ideas.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a relative velocity problem involving a man running on a conveyor belt. The man takes 2.5 seconds to run with the belt and 10 seconds to run against it, leading to the need to determine the relationship between his speed and the conveyor belt's speed. Participants clarify that the man's speed must be greater than the belt's for him to return successfully. By setting up equations based on the time taken for each scenario, they derive the relationship between the man's speed (u) and the belt's speed (v) as u = 7.5/12.5 v or v = 12.5/7.5 u. The conversation concludes with a confirmation of understanding the concept behind the problem.
Siracuse
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Halliday/Resnick/Walker, 1 - Mechanics, 7th Edition.
Chap. 4, Exercise 57 - Relative Movement in One Dimension

(I'm sorry if translation sounds confusing at first, the book is in Portuguese)

A suspicious man runs as fast as he can on a conveyor belt, taking aprox. 2.5 seconds to reach the other side. Then, a guard(lit. "security agent") shows up and the man tries to run back as fast as he can to the start point, taking 10 seconds. What is the (lit.) "reason" between the man's speed and the conveyor belt's speed?

Homework Equations



The "reason" (don't know the right word) that the problem is asking for is basically:

(X_m)/(X_b), where v_m is the man's speed and v_b is the conveyor belt's speed.

Revelant equation for R. M. in one Dimension:

X_pa = X_pb + X_ba; for velocity and acceleration, just a matter of taking the derivatives.

The Attempt at a Solution



All I could do was a superficial analysis of the problem: if it took less time to walk from x_0(start point) to x_f(end point) while on the conveyor belt when compared to the second displacement, obviously the vectors v_m and v_b are in the same direction (positive in respect to the x-axis) in the first displacement.

I have 2 known referentials: the man and the conveyor belt. A third one, the "stationary" referential, would be the floor (f). So, renaming the variables the eq. for R. M.,

X_mf = X_mb + X_bf

From here...no idea what to do. How exactly do I relate the man's velocity on the conveyor belt and the man's velocity while running by foot?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are over complicating it. Reason = relation / ratio.

The man runs a distance x in 2.5 seconds with the belt and 10secs against it.
so he is doing x/2.5 m/s in one case and x/10 m/s in the other.
We assume his legs are running at the same speed in both cases.
We also know he must be running faster than belt or he would never get back ( this let's us check we have the signs correct!)
Let v=speed of man u=speed of belt

First case u+v = x/2.5 second case u-v=x/10
X is the same, so x = 2.5(u + v) = 10(u-v)
2.5v+10v = 10u-2.5u so 12.5u = 7.5v then u = 7.5/12.5 v or v = 12.5/7.5 u
 
Last edited:
mgb_phys said:
I think you are over complicating it. Reason = relation / ratio.

I do that very often.

The man runs a distance x in 2.5 seconds with the belt and 10secs against it.
so he is doing x/2.5 m/s in one case and x/10 m/s in the other.
We assume his legs are running at the same speed in both cases.
We also know he must be running faster than belt or he would never get back ( this let's us check we have the signs correct!)
Let v=speed of man u=speed of belt

First case u+v = x/2.5 second case u-v=x/10
X is the same, so x = 2.5(u + v) = 10(u-v)
2.5v+10v = 10u-2.5u so 12.5u = 7.5v then u = 7.5/12.5 v or v = 12.5/7.5 u

Sounds logically correct and more precise than my thinking. The answer's correct.

Nevermind that, got the concept...well, thanks nonetheless. :)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top