Understanding Relative Velocity of Runners Moving in Opposite Directions

AI Thread Summary
James runs west while Billy runs east at twice James' speed. The relative velocity of James with respect to Billy changes based on their direction; when running toward each other, their velocities add up, resulting in a higher relative speed. Conversely, when running away from each other, their velocities also add, but the relative distance covered appears different. Using symbols for their velocities clarifies the relationship, with Billy's velocity being negative relative to James. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving relative velocity problems in physics.
samisoccer9
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


James is running west wrt the ground and Billy is running east wrt the ground, but twice as fast as James. How does the relative velocity of James wrt Billy differ if they are running toward each other or away from each other? Explain.
*wrt = with relation to*

Homework Equations


VJG and VBG

The Attempt at a Solution


This is a word problem, I just started an online grade 12 physics class today so I am sort of clueless and quite confused. So I interpreted it like this. Let's say James was 100m/s, therefore Billy is 200m/s. If they run away from each other, so one left/west one right/east then in relation to the ground it would seem as if Billy covered more distance (which would be true?) and if they were running towards each other, then I thought it would be seen as Billy simply again covering more distance by the time James got there. I need help, please and thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Drawing a picture will help with almost every physics problem.

Rather than assign a number to the velocities, it is better to use symbols, like Vb and Vj for the velocities of james and billy relative to the ground.

Then Vb = -2Vj

Think about why the sign is negative.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top