Relativistic Effects on CMB and Cosmic Rays

  • Thread starter Thread starter qraal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
qraal
Messages
787
Reaction score
3
Imagine moving at relativistic speeds. The moving object sees the Cosmic Microwave Background blueshift and become moved into the forward field of view due to aberration. Of course the hemisphere behind becomes even darker due to red-shift, while the forward hemisphere contracts towards a point. My question is: once the object is moving fast enough for the CMB to become visible, then what is the flux observed coming from the forward direction? And is it concentrated into a 'beam' by aberration or merely visible as a central point in the forward direction of all co-moving observers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this about what one observes as one approaches relativistic velocities? Or is it about the CMB? I'm having trouble understandfing why you are relating these two phenomena.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Is this about what one observes as one approaches relativistic velocities? Or is it about the CMB? I'm having trouble understandfing why you are relating these two phenomena.

The CMB at extreme levels of relativistic aberration and blue-shift.
 
qraal said:
The CMB at extreme levels of relativistic aberration and blue-shift.
OK well, there's all sorts of radiation out there that's not CMB. They will undergo the same effect.
 
DaveC426913 said:
OK well, there's all sorts of radiation out there that's not CMB. They will undergo the same effect.

Indeed. Above a certain gamma-factor the cosmic rays "from behind", the rear hemisphere, will be absorbed by the front shields.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top