Relativistic energy and time dilation

Marin
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
hi there!

I`m stuck on the following two questions and I hope you could help me :)

I´m given the kinetic energy of a particle. How am I supposed to calculate its velocity? there´s no mass of rest, no total energy, just the kinetic energy.



2. While trying to calculate the time dilation in the inertial frame of a satellite, it´s velocity appears too small to experience relativistic effects. The satellite´s orbit´s radius around the Earth is 20.10^6m, which gives a velocity of v=1454,4 m/s (with respect to Earth´s angular velocity). Now plugging it into the Lorentz factor "gamma" it appears to be really insignificant! Am I doing something wrong there?


thanks a lot in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For your first question, I would assume that you are told what type of particle it is. If so, you can look up its rest mass and use that to calculate its velocity.For your 2nd question, I didn't bother plugging in the numbers, but your answer seems reasonable. The time dilation of a satellite is very small. If your calculator doesn't have enough significant digits to give you a more accurate answer than \gamma=1 , you can use a taylor approximation for gamma to get: \gamma=\left( 1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}\right)^{-1/2} \approx 1+\frac{v^2}{2c^2} to give you a better answer.
 
thanks, gabbagabbahey!

but I still find it incorrect not to give such essential constants in the assignments. I thought I was doing it wrong :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top