Relativistic invaraiance of a simple electrodynamic quantity

ak99
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Under what conditions is the quantity E^2+B^2 relativistically invariant?


Homework Equations


E\cdot B and E^2-c^2B^2 are invariant.

(Also Lorentz transformation laws for E and B which I won't type here.)

The Attempt at a Solution



I think you can just subtract multiples E^2-c^2B^2 from the given quantity to show that E^2 and B^2 must also be separately invariant if the given quantity is invariant, which I think happens only if E and B are both zero. But I have been told this is wrong by someone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(Technical point: You may set c=1 in the above expressions.)
 
I don't think there are any such conditions, except if each is zero.
 
ak99 said:

Homework Statement


Under what conditions is the quantity E^2+B^2 relativistically invariant?


Homework Equations


E\cdot B and E^2-c^2B^2 are invariant.

(Also Lorentz transformation laws for E and B which I won't type here.)

The Attempt at a Solution



I think you can just subtract multiples E^2-c^2B^2 from the given quantity to show that E^2 and B^2 must also be separately invariant if the given quantity is invariant, which I think happens only if E and B are both zero. But I have been told this is wrong by someone.

E^2 + B^2 is not invariant in general since it is the energy-density of the field and thus transforms as the 00 component of a rank 2 tensor... but... how about rotations?
 
olgranpappy said:
E^2 + B^2 is not invariant in general since it is the energy-density of the field and thus transforms as the 00 component of a rank 2 tensor... but... how about rotations?
It is invariant under rotations.
 
true.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top