Relativistic kinetic energy comapred to Newtonian

accountkiller
Messages
118
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the speed of a particle whose relativistic kinetic energy is 40% greater than the Newtonian value for the same speed.

Krel = relativistic kinetic energy
Knew = Newtonian kinetic energy


Homework Equations


Krel = (gamma - 1)mc^2
Knew = 0.5mv^2
gamma = 1/sqrt(1-x)
x = v^2 / c^2


The Attempt at a Solution


So I set it up as K(relativistic) = 1.4K(Newton).. because my problem was 40%.
So (gamma - 1)mc^2 = 1.4 (0.5mv^2) and..
(gamma - 1) = (0.7mv^2)/mc^2
... m's on top and bottom cancel out, then I replaced v^2/c^2 by x...
(gamma - 1) = 0.7x
1/sqrt(1-x) = 0.7x + 1
1/(1-x) = (0.7x+1)^2
1 = 0.49x^2 + 14x + 1 - 0.49x^3 - 1.4x^2 - x
0 = x(-0.49x^2 - 1.09x + 0.4)

Using the quadratic formula, I get either x = -3.12 or x = 0.9

Since x = v^2 / c^2,
v = sqrt(x)*c
So I get v = 0.9c

But the answer is 0.61c.

Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mbradar2 said:
0 = x(-0.49x^2 - 1.09x + 0.4)
One of the coefficients in this equation is wrong. (Just a little math mistake)
 
Ohh man, how did I not catch that? I reworked this three times, with a calculator even, and didn't notice that little mistake.

Thank you so much! I'm relieved it was just a small math mistake. You're a lifesaver :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top