Relativistic kinetic energy - particle decay

AI Thread Summary
A pion at rest decays into a muon and an antineutrino, prompting a calculation of the muon's kinetic energy and the antineutrino's energy. The initial attempt assumed the antineutrino's energy to be negligible, leading to a calculated kinetic energy of approximately 33.7 MeV, which contradicts the book's answer of 4.08 MeV. The discussion highlights the importance of conservation laws, particularly momentum conservation, in particle decay scenarios. It emphasizes that in two-body decays, the lighter particle (the muon) carries most of the kinetic energy. Accurate calculations must consider the relationships between momentum and energy, even for massless particles like the antineutrino.
Phynos
Messages
31
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



A pion at rest (mπ = 273me) decays into a muon (mμ = 207me) and an antineutrino (mn ≈ 0).

Find (a) the kinetic energy of the muon and (b) the energy of the antineutrino in electron volts.

Homework Equations



K = (γ-1)mc2

E = γmc2

ER = mc2

E2 = p2c2 + (mc2)2

I didn't use all of these, but I'm assuming a solution requires one or more of them.

The Attempt at a Solution



Not really sure how to go about this when the mass of the neutrino is so close to zero. If I assume the total energy after the reaction of the neutrino is essentially zero, then the missing energy goes into the motion of the muon.

Kμ ≈ E - E
= c2 (mπ - mμ)
= c2 (0.511*106eV/c2)(273-207)
= 3.37*107 eV
= 33.7 MeV

The answer in the book is 4.08MeV so either my assumption that Kn ≈ 0 is a bad one, or I've made a mistake somewhere here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your assumption is bad. In fact, in a two body decay, the lighter decay product will carry most of the kinetic energy.

You need to fulfill the conservation laws involved, which are they?
 
Orodruin said:
Yes, your assumption is bad. In fact, in a two body decay, the lighter decay product will carry most of the kinetic energy.

You need to fulfill the conservation laws involved, which are they?

So momentum needs to be conserved, however the momentum is proportional to mass just like kinetic energy, which is what lead me to conclude the kinetic energy must be close to zero. How do I go about calculating the momentum of something for which I do not know the mass?
 
Momentum is only proportional to mass for fixed velocity < c. You can only draw the conclusion that a light particle has smaller energy or momentum than a heavy if they have the same speed.

You already have a relation between the momentum and total energy of a particle. This relation is true also for massless particles.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top