Relativistic kinetic energy - particle decay

AI Thread Summary
A pion at rest decays into a muon and an antineutrino, prompting a calculation of the muon's kinetic energy and the antineutrino's energy. The initial attempt assumed the antineutrino's energy to be negligible, leading to a calculated kinetic energy of approximately 33.7 MeV, which contradicts the book's answer of 4.08 MeV. The discussion highlights the importance of conservation laws, particularly momentum conservation, in particle decay scenarios. It emphasizes that in two-body decays, the lighter particle (the muon) carries most of the kinetic energy. Accurate calculations must consider the relationships between momentum and energy, even for massless particles like the antineutrino.
Phynos
Messages
31
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



A pion at rest (mπ = 273me) decays into a muon (mμ = 207me) and an antineutrino (mn ≈ 0).

Find (a) the kinetic energy of the muon and (b) the energy of the antineutrino in electron volts.

Homework Equations



K = (γ-1)mc2

E = γmc2

ER = mc2

E2 = p2c2 + (mc2)2

I didn't use all of these, but I'm assuming a solution requires one or more of them.

The Attempt at a Solution



Not really sure how to go about this when the mass of the neutrino is so close to zero. If I assume the total energy after the reaction of the neutrino is essentially zero, then the missing energy goes into the motion of the muon.

Kμ ≈ E - E
= c2 (mπ - mμ)
= c2 (0.511*106eV/c2)(273-207)
= 3.37*107 eV
= 33.7 MeV

The answer in the book is 4.08MeV so either my assumption that Kn ≈ 0 is a bad one, or I've made a mistake somewhere here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your assumption is bad. In fact, in a two body decay, the lighter decay product will carry most of the kinetic energy.

You need to fulfill the conservation laws involved, which are they?
 
Orodruin said:
Yes, your assumption is bad. In fact, in a two body decay, the lighter decay product will carry most of the kinetic energy.

You need to fulfill the conservation laws involved, which are they?

So momentum needs to be conserved, however the momentum is proportional to mass just like kinetic energy, which is what lead me to conclude the kinetic energy must be close to zero. How do I go about calculating the momentum of something for which I do not know the mass?
 
Momentum is only proportional to mass for fixed velocity < c. You can only draw the conclusion that a light particle has smaller energy or momentum than a heavy if they have the same speed.

You already have a relation between the momentum and total energy of a particle. This relation is true also for massless particles.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top