Can Relativistic Propulsion Take Us Beyond Our Solar System?

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of thermoelectric radioisotope batteries and solar sails as methods of propulsion in space. The idea of using a thermoelectric radioisotope battery to power an electron accelerator for continued propulsion beyond the solar system is proposed, but there are concerns about the feasibility and effectiveness of this design. The concept of ion propulsion is also mentioned as a potential alternative. The conversation also touches on the topic of relativistic momentum and provides some suggestions for further research.
  • #1
jlefevre76
121
6
Okay, I tried searching for this in the forums and didn't really find what I was looking for. So, I'll start a new thread and if anybody has seen this before, feel free to drop a link to an old thread or whatever.

Many of our older space probes use/used thermoelectric radioisotope batteries to power their electronics as they move/moved through space. Solar sails are a good option when it comes to free propulsion in space near to the sun, but further out they stop working and lose their effectiveness if further acceleration is desired. Besides that, there are plenty of material science challenges with development of sails (though I think a lot of them have been solved and some space probes recently have made use of solar sails).

As an alternative, why not use a thermoelectric radioisotope battery to power an electron accelerator to allow for continued propulsion beyond the known solar system, to perhaps make it to a neighboring system? On that note, I wanted to do a simple analysis, but I'm having trouble figuring out how the momentum equations change to accommodate relativity, assuming the electrons are accelerated to relativistic speeds.

Other than requiring a ridiculous length to accommodate an accelerator inductor system, I think this might work. Any problems anybody wants to point out before I waste too much time on this (if there are major problems I'm probably overlooking). Would there be enough electrons in deep space to keep the craft close to a neutral charge (as this would quickly eat into the power required per electron I'm thinking).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
As an alternative,...
to what? afaik solar sails are not currently used.
... why not use a thermoelectric radioisotope battery to power an electron accelerator to allow for continued propulsion beyond the known solar system, to perhaps make it to a neighboring system?
... because there are better designs of ion-drive in use.
Google "ion drive".
 
  • #3
You're right, they have not been used for propulsion, I misunderstood some reading I did a few years back. Japan has run some tests though using IKAROS, so maybe one day it will become a system of propulsion. I'm familiar with the basics of ion propulsion, I was just hoping to skip the inconvenience of carrying ionizing material and ionizing the propulsive elements before accelerating them, which an "electron" drive would be able to do theoretically.

As for the conservation of momentum equations framed in relativistic terms, anybody mind linking to an example or posting some here?

Of course, I guess stripping a material of electrons would require the same energy as ionizing the propulsion material?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
jlefevre76 said:
As for the conservation of momentum equations framed in relativistic terms, anybody mind linking to an example or posting some here?
They look the same as for classical physics with the addition that you must use the relativistic expression for momentum.
 
  • #5
Yup, so that's what I'm asking for. Link or equation?
 
  • #6
This question is of the nature that you will probably be best helped by typing "relativistic momentum" into Google or another search engine. This should give you several relevant links.
 
  • #7
I'd suggest looking at ion thrusters, which do much the same thing. However, heavy ions are preferred over electrons in the only designs I've heard of. I assume this is to get better acceleration.

You might also look at Vasimir, and some of the threads on PF about it (including the difficulty of finding a power supply for it.)

I don't think thermoelectric power supplies have a very good weight/power ratio, unfortunately.

As far as relativistic momentum goes, it's gamma * m * v. You might also find the relativisitic rocket equations http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.html interesting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. How does relativistic propulsion work?

Relativistic propulsion is a theoretical concept that involves using a combination of advanced technologies, such as nuclear fusion, antimatter, or laser propulsion, to accelerate a spacecraft to speeds close to the speed of light. This would allow for faster travel through space and could potentially take us beyond our solar system.

2. What are the potential benefits of using relativistic propulsion?

The main benefit of relativistic propulsion is the potential to travel vast distances in a relatively short amount of time, which could open up new opportunities for space exploration and discovery. It could also reduce the effects of long-term space travel on astronauts, as they would spend less time exposed to the hazards of space radiation.

3. What are the challenges of developing relativistic propulsion?

One of the main challenges of developing relativistic propulsion is the immense amount of energy required to accelerate a spacecraft to near-light speeds. This would require advanced and efficient propulsion systems that are currently only theoretical. There are also potential safety concerns and ethical considerations that would need to be addressed.

4. How close are we to achieving relativistic propulsion?

Currently, relativistic propulsion is still a theoretical concept and there are no functioning systems in place. However, there have been advancements in technologies such as laser propulsion and nuclear fusion that could potentially be used in the future to achieve relativistic speeds. It is difficult to predict when or if we will be able to achieve relativistic propulsion.

5. Are there any potential risks associated with using relativistic propulsion?

There are several potential risks associated with using relativistic propulsion, such as the potential for collisions with space debris at high speeds and the effects of time dilation on the human body. There are also concerns about the impact of such advanced technologies on the environment and potential consequences for other planets or celestial bodies that may be encountered during travel.

Similar threads

  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
2
Replies
61
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
904
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
75
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
10
Views
868
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top