Relativistic wheel and orbit connection?

yuiop
Messages
3,962
Reaction score
20
I have noticed an apparent correlation between two seemingly unconnected phenomena, but I do not have the mathematical ability to prove the connection.

I was wondering what a rolling wheel would look like at relativistic speeds. To investigate this I created a java simulation that solves the problem numerically. It was more difficult than I first imagined, as it was not a simple case of applying the Lorentz transformations as the situation is complicated by simultaneity. When one spoke is opposite the other at 3 o’clock and 9 o’clock to an observer commoving with the wheel axle, they are not opposite each other to the observer that is stationary with respect to the road. (The two spokes are only opposite each other in both reference frames when they are at the 12 o’clock and 6 o’clock positions. The simulation also shows that in the road reference frame, the angular velocity of the rim at side nearest the road is much greater than the angular velocity furthest from the road. The simulation ignores the visual effect due to light travel times that causes an apparent rotation out of the rolling frame.

I ran the relativistic wheel simulation alongside a gravitational orbital simulation. I adjusted the orbit to a similar elliptical shape and radius as the wheel in the road frame. I noticed that the motion of the orbiting body appears to match the motion of a point on the rim of the rolling wheel, (when the forward motion of the wheel is deducted)

I am sure there is some interesting physics and maths to be discovered here for someone who has the ability.

One possible connection is that angular momentum is conserved in both scenarios. However there is the complication that a gravitational orbiting body has its centre of angular momentum at one focus of the ellipse, while the rolling wheel has its centre in the normal centre.

There is another geometrical connection too. Imagine a cone with a circle and an ellipse formed from planes intersecting with the cone. A point on the circumference of the circle is made to follow the circumference at constant velocity. A ray drawn from the apex of the cone to the moving point on the circle intersects the edge of the ellipse to form a second point following the circumference of the ellipse. The motion of the intersecting point on the ellipse appears to follow the same complex motion of the orbiting gravitational body and the point on the rim of the relativistic wheel. (Assuming all 3 have similar elliptical shapes with similar eccentricity)

Is there anyone out there with the physics/maths/geometry ability and knowledge to make the connections?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kev said:
I was wondering what a rolling wheel would look like at relativistic speeds. To investigate this I created a java simulation that solves the problem numerically. It was more difficult than I first imagined, as it was not a simple case of applying the Lorentz transformations as the situation is complicated by simultaneity.
You schould checkout http://www.spacetimetravel.org/rad/rad.html" . They not only take the Lorentz transformations into account, but also the light travel times, to predict what an observer would see.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks A.T. for the great link.

The green wheel in the third video down is closest to the type of motion I am talking about. I am still hoping that someone will come up with a mathematical formula for the motion of a point on the rim of the relativistic wheel. It may be that there is no simple solution, just as there is no simple formula for the length of the perimeter of an ellipse or for the motion of an body in an eliptical orbit. The usual solutions involve series and aproximations. I assume the 4D simulations in the link were created using numerical solutions similar to the method I used or possibly tables. My method is suitable to create a simulation, but a mathematical formula would give an insight to the connection between relativistic rotation and the elliptical gravitational orbital motion of a body.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top