Relativity and observed length of a moving object

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of length contraction in special relativity, specifically regarding a cubical box moving at 0.89c. The proper length of the box is 2.3 m, and while the lengths perpendicular to the direction of motion remain unchanged, the length parallel to the motion must be calculated using the correct formula. The user initially misapplied the length contraction equation, mistakenly treating the velocity as a fraction rather than a multiple of the speed of light. After clarification, the user successfully understands how to apply the formula correctly to find the observed length. This highlights the importance of accurately interpreting variables in relativistic equations.
goWlfpack
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Relativity and observed length of a moving object!

Homework Statement


A box is cubical with sides of proper lengths L1 = L2 = L3 = 2.3 m, as shown in the figure below, when viewed in its own rest frame. This block moves parallel to one of its edges with a speed of 0.89c past an observer.
What is the length of each side as measured by this observer? Assume that the side that the block is moving parallel to is L1.


Homework Equations


L = Lp square root(v^2/c^2)


The Attempt at a Solution


so i got the answer to L2 and L3 which are the sides of the cube perpendicular to the direction of travel. However i don't know how to find the length of the parallel side. anybody know why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Look up "length contraction" in special relativity.
 


thats where i found the equation, the v squared/ c squared came out so small that 1 minus that came to just 1... and then the length is the same... but that was wrong
 


Show exactly what you did. (The equation in your first post is not correct.)
 


Doc Al said:
Show exactly what you did. (The equation in your first post is not correct.)

ok, i took the proper length, which is 2.3 and multiplied it by the square root of (1 - v^2/c^2) i used .89 as v and 2.99e8 for c

when i did v^2 / c^2 i got 8.86e-18
when i do 1 - that answer, the change is so insignificant that it just counts as one. the square root of 1 is 1 and 1 multiplied by 2.3 is 2.3 .. but that is not right
 


goWlfpack said:
ok, i took the proper length, which is 2.3 and multiplied it by the square root of (1 - v^2/c^2) i used .89 as v and 2.99e8 for c
v = 0.89c, not 0.89.
So what's v/c?
 


Doc Al said:
v = 0.89c, not 0.89.
So what's v/c?

got it! green check! :) i always miss little things like that! thanks so much!
 
Back
Top