Relativity - energies of particles in circular motion

Ciumko
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Summary: What is energy of proton, deuteron and alpha particle in circular motion of the same radius.

Hello, I have a problem.

Here is the content of an exercise:

In some experiment, proton with energy of 1MeV is in circular motion in isotropic magnetic field. What energies would have deuteron and alpha particle to orbit in a circle of the exact same radius r?Wouldn't be much of a problem if it wouldn't be "relativity" problem. In classical example I would guess that for deuteron energy would be twice as big as for single proton (because of additional neutron), and for alpha particle it would be four times the energy of single proton. I am not 100% familliar with ale the relativity nuances, so I'd like to ask: Is my reasoning correct? Or there are additional effects taking place?

[Moderator's note: Moved from a technical forum and thus no template.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't explain your reasoning. You just said it was a guess.
 
Yes and I would like to know the answer - just to know that my reasoning is right or wrong.

$$E_{k}=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}$$

so, as the radius have to remain the same:

$$F_{c}=\frac{mv^{2}}{r}$$

As the mass grows up to 2 or 4 the times of single proton you get energy two or four times the initial.But from the other side we know that ## F=\frac{mv^{2}}{r}=Bqv ##, taking velocity from that and applying in classical approach -> $$E_{k}=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{B^{2}q^{2}r^{2}}{m}$$ we have dependence of type ##E_{k}=E_{k}(\frac{q^{2}}{m})## so:

If for proton ##E_{k}=1MeV## then for deuteron (which is one proton and one neutron, so mass is twice as big as single proton) ##E_{k}=0.5MeV##, and for alpha particle (two protons and two neutrons) ##E_{k}=1MeV##

Which one is correct for classical approach and how to tackle it in relativity?
 
Last edited:
Ciumko said:
Yes and I would like to know the answer - just to know that my reasoning is right or wrong.

$$E_{k}=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}$$

so, as the radius have to remain the same:

$$F_{c}=\frac{mv^{2}}{r}$$

As the mass grows up to 2 or 4 the times of single proton you.But from the other side we know that ## F=\frac{mv^{2}}{r}=Bqv ##, taking velocity from that and applying in classical approach -> $$E_{k}=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{B^{2}q^{2}r^{2}}{m}$$ we have dependence of type ##E_{k}=E_{k}(\frac{q^{2}}{m})## so:

If for proton ##E_{k}=1MeV## then for deuteron (which is one proton and one neutron, so mass is twice as big as single proton) ##E_{k}=0.5MeV##, and for alpha particle (two protons and two neutrons) ##E_{k}=1MeV##

Which one is correct for classical approach and how to tackle it in relativity?

This all looks correct, except the notation at the end is confusing.

You need something like

##E_p = \frac{(qBr)^2}{2m} = 1MeV##

Then:

##E_d = \frac{(qBr)^2}{4m} = \frac12 E_p##

And,

##E_a = \frac{(2qBr)^2}{8m} = E_p##

Regarding relativity, the same formula applies for momentum:

##p = qBr##

But now ##p = \gamma mv## is the relativistic momentum and is related to the (total) energy of the particle ##\gamma mc^2## by:

##E^2 = p^2c^2 + m^2c^4##

You could see what you can do with that.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top