Representation of covariant and contravariant vectors on spacetime diagrams

mersecske
Messages
186
Reaction score
0
Hi,

How can we represent covariant and contravariant vectors on curved spacetime diagrams?

How can we draw these vectors on a spacetime diagram?
Contravariant vectors are really vectors,
therefore we can represent them on the diagram with directed line elements.
Covariant vectors are linear functions acting on contravariant vectors,
therefore the basis of a covariant system
can be represented also with directed line elements, I think,
because these functions can be see as scalar products.
The main question: what is the basis unit vectors on the diagram?
I think that contravariant unit vectors are parallel
to the x=const coordinate curves on the diagram,
and covariant basis unit vectors are orthogonal to it.
Am I right?
But this is just its direction, what about its length (on the diagram)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mersecske said:
Hi,

How can we represent covariant and contravariant vectors on curved spacetime diagrams?

Since they are defined in the tangent spaces, you have to imagine them to be infinitesimally small.

How can we draw these vectors on a spacetime diagram?
Contravariant vectors are really vectors,
therefore we can represent them on the diagram with directed line elements.
Covariant vectors are linear functions acting on contravariant vectors,
therefore the basis of a covariant system
can be represented also with directed line elements, I think,
because these functions can be see as scalar products.
The main question: what is the basis unit vectors on the diagram?
I think that contravariant unit vectors are parallel
to the x=const coordinate curves on the diagram,
and covariant basis unit vectors are orthogonal to it.
Am I right?
But this is just its direction, what about its length (on the diagram)?

[PLAIN]http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/8721/vec5.jpg

Covariant vectors are represented by a directed pair of parallel planes. Contravariant vectors are represented by directed line segments. In this representation, the action of a covariant vector on a contravariant vector would be given by "the number of times the directed line segment pierces the parallel planes", interpreted in a continuous sense.

In Minkowski space, the canonical basis for the tangent and cotangent spaces is derived from the coordinate functions xµ of an inertial frame.

In the diagram above, dt is the gradient of the function t on spacetime, and it is one of the basis vectors in the canonical basis. The representation of covectors in the spacetime diagram as parallel lines has a scaling behavior which is opposite to that of vectors. The lines of 2dt are twice as close to each other as those of dt.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mersecske said:
How can we represent covariant and contravariant vectors on curved spacetime diagrams?

Contravariant and covariant vectors "live" in different spaces. If you want to draw arrows in a same diagram, draw a contravariant vector the usual way, while you can draw a covariant vector simply taking the spatial components with the opposite sign (same angle with the t-axis, but "on the other side"). This way the minkowsky scalar product becomes the usual euclidean product. For example, a covariant vector is orthogonal to a contravariant vector if and only if the two arrows are perpendicular on the drawing (in the usual euclidean sense). You see also that any contravariant vector on the light cone is orthogonal to it's own associated covariant vector.

I don't know if I interpret your question correctly though.
 
dx said:
Since they are defined in the tangent spaces, you have to imagine them to be infinitesimally small.

Yes I know, but the relative length to each other is relevant!
 
Petr Mugver said:
Contravariant and covariant vectors "live" in different spaces.

Yes, I want a representation of contravariant and covariant vectors separately.
And I also want to define the act of 1-forms on vectors on the diagram,
which is some kind of geometrical definition.
It would be nice if somebody can make a sample simple plot with the unit basis vectors
on the Penrose-Carter diagram of the Schwarzschild spacetime or other curved space.

For example, how can we draw (represent) two orthogonal contravariant vector on the space-time diagram?
 
Last edited:
If you have access to Introducing Einstein's Relativity by Ray d'Inverno, take a look at Fig. 17.10, which is a Penrose diagram for the Kruskal extension of Schwarzschild.

In general, to see the directions of a vector field, (plot the images of) the integral curves of the vector field.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top