Representation of j=1 rotation matrix

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] Representation of j=1 rotation matrix

The derivation of this involves the use of the following fact for j=1:

[atex]\frac{J_y}{\hbar} = (J_y/\hbar)^3[/itex].

Is there a simple way to see this other than slogging through the algebra by expanding out the RHS using J_y = \frac{1}{2i}(J_+ - J_i) and J_{\pm}|jm\rangle = \hbar\sqrt{(j\mp m)(j \pm m + 1)}| j,m\pm 1\rangle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jdstokes said:
The derivation of this involves the use of the following fact for j=1:
[atex]\frac{J_y}{\hbar} = (J_y/\hbar)^3[/itex].
That's not true in general, since the eigenvalues of J_y for j=1 are +1,0,-1.
It is not true for j=-1. Perhaps there is a special circumstance in your problem.
 
Hi Pam,

It is true for j=1, and I was being stupid anyway, the trick is to use matrix multiplication.

Ie just write down \langle j'=1,m'| J_y|j=1,m\rangle and do the trivial matrix multiplication. Doh!
 
Of course, I made the silly mistake of thinking (-1)^3=+1.
Using the evs is a simpler proof than even trivial matrix math.
 
evs?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top