Representation of units with abbreviations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the proper representation of unit abbreviations, highlighting that metric unit abbreviations do not end with periods, while other unit abbreviations typically do, except for those involving "per" like mph. Participants express confusion over the rules and seek clarity on when to use periods. Additionally, there is a query about the convention for displaying units on graphs, with a consensus that units should be placed in parentheses for clarity. The conversation reflects a desire for a general rule to simplify understanding of unit representation. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of consistency in unit abbreviation usage.
GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I just now came to the realization that I don't know the standard for representing units. When do I include "." after the abbreviation and when do I not? Thanks.

For example
mi. or mi
m or m.
yr. or yr

What's the rule? I'm sure there's got to be some general rule to apply to all units instead of memorizing weather or not to use it or not for each unit.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Abbreviations for metric units don't end in periods, but abbreviations for everything else, except those with "per," (such as mph) do.
Who knows why...
 
hm thanks... one last question about units
 
Last edited:
What's the convention for units on graphs like if you wanted to include units on a axis?
I remember in elementary school they always told us
Time (m)
would it be improper to just do
Time m
without putting the units in "()"?
 
Well I'm not absolutely sure on this one. But I think it is convention to put the units in parentheses...it's a sort of side note, so it should be in parentheses. It would look wrong to have it without.
 
amy andrews said:
Abbreviations for metric units don't end in periods, but abbreviations for everything else, except those with "per," (such as mph) do.
Who knows why...

Wow. new thing to learn.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top