Representing |psi> with Continuous Eigenvectors: An Example

jinksys
Messages
122
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


for discrete basis vectors {{e_n}}, a state vector |psi> is represented by a column vector, with elements being psi_n = <e_n|psi>. When basis vectors correspond to those with continuous eigenvalues, vectors are represented by functions. Give such an example of a state vector |psi> being represented in a space spanned by position eigenvectors {|x>}.


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



C_n = <x_n | psi>

I'm really taking a shot in the dark with this one. I'm using Griffith's, so I assume my solutions lies somewhere in chapter 3.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


So...|\psi\rangle is a ket which is part of the space spanned by eigenvectors of X, the latter being kets satisfying X|x\rangle = x |x\rangle, where the x is a real number, the spectral value of X.

Soo... |\psi\rangle = \mbox{(something)} ~ |x\rangle

What's (something) equal to ?
 


When you say spectral value, is that the same as the eigenvalue?
 


A generalization of eigenvalue. But you can think of it in a simplified way as an eigenvalue.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top