Residue Theorem applied to a keyhole contour

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
23 replies · 3K views
Teymur
Messages
16
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Use the Residue Theorem to show:

$$\int \:\frac{z^{\frac{1}{2}}}{1+\sqrt{2}z+z^2}dz=2^{\frac{2}{3}}\pi isin\left(\frac{8\pi }{3}\right)$$

for a keyhole contour where ##z=re^{i\theta }## and ##-\pi <\theta <\pi##
Relevant Equations
the standard residue theorem
I'm really struggling with this one. A newbie to using the residue theorem. I'm trying to solve this by factorising the denominator to find values for z0 and I have:

##z=\frac{-\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}}{2}## and ##z=\frac{-\sqrt{2}-i\sqrt{2}}{2}##

I also know that sin(3π/8)= ##\frac{\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}}}{2}##
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
Show us residues you calculated, please.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Hello,
Thanks for the responses. The integral is a closed contour integral (with a branch cut along the negative x-axis so the function is not multi-valued) but I couldn't find the correct symbol with the integral sign having a circle. The residue theorem states that in place of calculating the integral explicitly, it is equivalent to 2*pi*i*sum of residues.
 
anuttarasammyak said:
Show us residues you calculated, please.
I haven't that's the problem. The first step, in the process I'm familiar with, is to factorise the denominator so that you can find values of z for which their are isolated singularities. I've tried to do that and I've given my results in the original post. Not sure where to go next..

p.s. I'm aware you can use the Laurent series, but my series expansion knowledge isn't great. Hence I'm trying to compute this using poles.
 
Last edited:
FactChecker said:
The path of integration is not clear to me. I can make a guess, but it is better if you spell it out. What is the multiplier 'a'? What is a "keyhole contour"?
the "a" was a mistake, sorry. I've removed it
 
FactChecker said:
What is a "keyhole contour"?
This is an example:

contour.jpg
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude
Teymur said:
I haven't that's the problem. The first step, in the process I'm familiar with, is to factorise the denominator so that you can find values of z for which their are isolated singularities. I've tried to do that and I've given my results in the original post. Not sure where to go next..
These are simple poles, so what's the procedure for calculating the residue of a simple pole?
 
vela said:
Please correct the typos in your work. There's a fairly obvious one, but I suspect there are more.
Ah yes, so sorry!! The integral should give:

$$2^{\frac{3}{2}}\pi \:isin\left(\frac{3\pi }{8}\right)$$

I got the numerators and denominators mixed up! Soz
 
vela said:
These are simple poles, so what's the procedure for calculating the residue of a simple pole?
Yes exactly, simple poles. Firstly, I'm just checking to see if the values I have obtained for z0 at the poles are correct, they seem unwieldly. If they are correct, you multiply f(z) by (z-z0) and evaluate the result at =z0.. I've tried to do that but can't see how it would get you to the intended outcome.
 
Teymur said:
Yes exactly, simple poles. Firstly, I'm just checking to see if the values I have obtained for z0 at the poles are correct, they seem unwieldly.
The values of ##z_0## seem right. What are they in polar form?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela
Teymur said:
Firstly, I'm just checking to see if the values I have obtained for z0 at the poles are correct, they seem unwieldly.
You can always check them by plugging them back into the quadratic and seeing if the result is 0. They are indeed a bit unwieldy for some parts of the calculation. As @julian suggested, you'll find it convenient to express them in polar form.

Teymur said:
If they are correct, you multiply f(z) by (z-z0) and evaluate the result at =z0. I've tried to do that but can't see how it would get you to the intended outcome.
Post what you get. Remember you have two poles, so it's the sum that will produce the result you want.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: julian and Teymur
Okay cool. Am I right that you get:

$$\cos \left(\frac{\pi }{4}\right)+isin\left(\frac{\pi }{4}\right)=e^{\frac{i\pi }{4}}$$

and

$$\cos \left(\frac{3\pi i}{4}\right)+isin\left(\frac{3\pi i}{4}\right)=e^{\frac{3\pi i}{4}}$$

And if so, is the next step:

$$\left(z-e^{\frac{\pi i}{4}}\right)f\left(z\right)=\left(z-e^{\frac{\pi i}{4}}\right)\frac{z^{\frac{1}{2}}}{\left(z-e^{\frac{\pi i}{4}}\right)\left(z-e^{\frac{3\pi i}{4}}\right)}$$

For ##z=e^{\frac{\pi i}{4}}##

$$\frac{e^{\frac{\pi i}{8}}}{\left(e^{\frac{\pi i}{4}}-e^{\frac{3\pi i}{4}}\right)}$$
 
Last edited:
The first one isn't correct, but the second one is. (Just check the signs.) Note that because the coefficients in the quadratic are real, the roots will be complex conjugates of each other. So this means the other root is ##e^{-3\pi i/4}##.

The next step will look okay once you fix the roots. I'd note it's a limit as ##z \to z_0##.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: julian
vela said:
The first one isn't correct, but the second one is. (Just check the signs.) Note that because the coefficients in the quadratic are real, the roots will be complex conjugates of each other. So this means the other root is ##e^{-3\pi i/4}##.

The next step will look okay once you fix the roots. I'd note it's a limit as ##z \to z_0##.
You mean that the roots are ##e^{\frac{3\pi i}{4}}## and ##e^{\frac{-3\pi i}{4}}##?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: julian
Are you saying:

$$\left(z-e^{\frac{3\pi i}{4}}\right)f\left(z\right)=\left(z-e^{\frac{3\pi i}{4}}\right)\frac{z^{\frac{1}{2}}}{\left(z-e^{\frac{3\pi i}{4}}\right)\left(z-e^{\frac{-3\pi i}{4}}\right)}$$

so that as z goes to z0:

$$\frac{e^{\frac{3\pi i}{8}}}{\left(e^{\frac{3\pi i}{4}}-e^{\frac{-3\pi i}{4}}\right)}$$
 
Teymur said:
Are you saying:

$$\left(z-e^{\frac{3\pi i}{4}}\right)f\left(z\right)=\left(z-e^{\frac{3\pi i}{4}}\right)\frac{z^{\frac{1}{2}}}{\left(z-e^{\frac{3\pi i}{4}}\right)\left(z-e^{\frac{-3\pi i}{4}}\right)}$$

so that as z goes to z0:

$$\frac{e^{\frac{3\pi i}{8}}}{\left(e^{\frac{3\pi i}{4}}-e^{\frac{-3\pi i}{4}}\right)}$$
Do the same thing with the root ##e^{-\frac{3\pi i}{4}}##. Add the two residues, then multiply by ##2 \pi i##.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Teymur
julian said:
Do the same thing with the root ##e^{-\frac{3\pi i}{4}}##. Add the two residues, then multiply by ##2 \pi i##.
working backwrads from the solution given in the question and putting aside the prefactor of ##2\pi i## that comes from the theorem, that means that the sum of the residues should give ##2^{\frac{1}{2}}sin\left(\frac{3\pi }{8}\right)##

I can't see how to get there from:

$$\frac{e^{\frac{3\pi \:i}{8}}}{e^{\frac{3\pi \:i}{4}}-e^{-\frac{3\pi \:i}{4}}}+\frac{e^{\frac{-3\pi \:i}{8}}}{e^{\frac{-3\pi \:i}{4}}-e^{\frac{3\pi \:i}{4}}}$$
 
I'm assuming the following identity has something to do with it, but can't seem to put it all together:

$$sin\left(x\right)=\frac{e^{ix}-e^{-ix}}{2i}$$
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
Teymur said:
working backwrads from the solution given in the question and putting aside the prefactor of ##2\pi i## that comes from the theorem, that means that the sum of the residues should give ##2^{\frac{1}{2}}sin\left(\frac{3\pi }{8}\right)##

I can't see how to get there from:

$$\frac{e^{\frac{3\pi \:i}{8}}}{e^{\frac{3\pi \:i}{4}}-e^{-\frac{3\pi \:i}{4}}}+\frac{e^{\frac{-3\pi \:i}{8}}}{e^{\frac{-3\pi \:i}{4}}-e^{\frac{3\pi \:i}{4}}}$$
The denominator of the 2nd term is the negative of the denominator of the first term. That allows you to write your expression as a single fraction.

And then, yes, you use ##\sin (x) = \frac{e^{i x} - e^{-i x}}{2i}##.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
I get the feeling this isn't the best way to simplify but what I get is as follows:

$$\frac{sin\left(\frac{3\pi }{8}\right)}{sin\left(\frac{3\pi }{4}\right)}=\sqrt{\frac{2+\sqrt{2}}{2}}$$

If you then multiply through by ##2^{\frac{1}{2}}## you get:

$$2^{\frac{1}{2}}\frac{\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}}}{2}=2^{\frac{1}{2}}sin\left(\frac{3\pi \:}{8}\right)$$

as required. If there's a simpler, straightforward way to do this, I'd be grateful to hear.
 
The sum of residues is indeed equal to:

\begin{align*}
\dfrac{\sin \left( \frac{3 \pi}{8} \right)}{\sin \left( \frac{3 \pi}{4} \right)}
\end{align*}

You then just substitute ##\sin \left( \frac{3 \pi}{4} \right) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}## into it to obtain the desired result.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker, Teymur and SammyS
Appreciate all the support
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: julian