Resistance of Quarter-Ring Conductor: Did I Get the Answer Right?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the resistance of a quarter-ring conductor with given dimensions and conductivity. The participant derived the resistance formula as R = (π/2) / (σh ln(b/a)), confirming its validity for the case when a approaches zero, resulting in zero resistance. They sought verification of their method after differing answers from peers. The response affirmed the derivation's correctness and highlighted the importance of checking if alternative answers also yield R=0 when a=0. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical integrity of handling integrals and reciprocals in the context of electrical resistance calculations.
mmiguel1
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I just had this problem on my Electromagnetics final. I want to know if I got this right and I can't find the problem with google.

Homework Statement


Consider a conducting quarter-ring.
It can be envisioned as one piece of a hollow cylinder that has been cut into fourths down its length.
The original hollow cylinder would have had inner radius a, outer radius b, and length h.
In cylindrical coordinates the geometry of this quarter ring is: r \in [a,b]; \phi \in [0,\pi/2]; and z \in [0,h];
The material of interest has conductivity \sigma
What is the resistance from the \phi=0 end to the \phi=\pi/2 end?

Homework Equations


For a conductor with linear geometry down it's length:
R = \frac{L}{\sigma A}
Where L = length and A = cross-sectional area;
G = \frac{1}{R}

The Attempt at a Solution


I considered a slice of the conductor corresponding to a differential angle d \phi.
The slice is described by:
r \in [a,b]; \phi \in [\phi_0,\phi_0+d\phi]; and z \in [0,h];
Let the resistance of this slice be dR. Since the total conductor is a series combination of these slices, and since series resistances add,
R = \int dR

Within the slice of interest, dR, consider a sub-slice located at radius r with a < r < b.
The sub-slice is described by:
r \in [r_0,r_0+dr]; \phi \in [\phi_0,\phi_0+d\phi]; and z \in [0,h];
Let us call the resistance of this sub-slice dR'. Our original slice, dR, is a parallel combination of many dR' sub-slices. It is therefore more convenient to calculate the conductances for this part of the problem. Define dG = \frac{1}{dR} and dG&#039; = \frac{1}{dR&#039;}. Since parallel conductances add, we have
dG = \int dG&#039;
As the differential values d\phi and dr tend to zero, the subslice of interest is linearized along its length.
We can therefore say
dG&#039; = \frac{\sigma A}{L} = \frac{\sigma h dr}{r d \phi}
Where A = h dr and L = r d \phi
dG = \int_a^b \frac{\sigma h}{d \phi} \frac{1}{r} dr
dG = \frac{\sigma h}{d \phi} \ln \left (\frac{b}{a} \right )
dR = \frac{d \phi}{\sigma h \ln \left ( \frac{b}{a} \right ) }
R = \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{d \phi}{\sigma h \ln \left ( \frac{b}{a} \right ) }
R = \frac{\pi}{2 \sigma h \ln \left ( \frac{b}{a} \right ) }

I was debating this question with my friends after the final. Each of us got different answers. I think my method is correct but I would like some verification.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your derivation looks fine, and your result is certainly true for the case a≈b as well as a=0.

Here is something to check with your friends: If a=0, then the two ends will be in contact, giving a resistance of 0. Your formula correctly reproduces that, since you are dividing by the ln term which approaches infinity as a→0.

Do any of your friends' answers give R=0 when a=0?
 
I honestly can't really remember. I am glad that you think my derivation makes sense. I just wanted to make sure I didn't violate any rules in math since I have never really dealt with reciprocals of integrals before. Thanks Redbelly98!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top