Resistive force against a bullet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the resistive force against a bullet using the conservation of energy principle. The original poster struggles with their calculations, believing that the energy difference between initial and final kinetic energy should equal the work done by friction. They explore the average force of resistance and consider impulse methods, but consistently arrive at results significantly different from their teacher's solution. There is uncertainty about the problem's parameters, such as the bullet's initial angle and whether the teacher's answer is accurate. Overall, the poster seeks clarity on the correct approach to determine the resistive force against the bullet.
Deckname
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A bullet of mass 20g hits a steel plate at 600m/s and ricochets in the direction of CD at 500m/s. The bullet makes an indentation in the plate of length 50mm with an entering and exiting angle of beta. The angle alpha between the leaving velocity vector and the horizon is 30°

Calculate the average force of resistance the steel plate is providing the bullet with.

Solution: 9.46x10^7 N
Relevant Equations
(1/2)mv^2
I tried getting to the solution by the principle of conservation of energy. What goes in, must go out. If the final velocity, ie. the final kinetic energy is lower than what we started with, that energy difference must've been used to overcome the friction that lasted over some distance L, meaning that the energy spent to overcome the friction is equal to the work done by the friction force F over the distance L. My way of thinking is now that KE(i)-KE(f)=F*L. It turns out I'm wrong and I don't really know how else I can attempt to arrive at the correct solution, which is magnitudes above what I keep getting.
 

Attachments

  • 20190411_232610.jpg
    20190411_232610.jpg
    78.6 KB · Views: 258
Physics news on Phys.org
Deckname said:
I tried getting to the solution by the principle of conservation of energy. What goes in, must go out. If the final velocity, ie. the final kinetic energy is lower than what we started with, that energy difference must've been used to overcome the friction that lasted over some distance L, meaning that the energy spent to overcome the friction is equal to the work done by the friction force F over the distance L. My way of thinking is now that KE(i)-KE(f)=F*L. It turns out I'm wrong and I don't really know how else I can attempt to arrive at the correct solution, which is magnitudes above what I keep getting.
"Force of resistance" may be ambiguous. The plate resists being penetrated, so it might mean the average force exerted.

Imagine the bullet had entered a smoothly curving tube, deflecting the bullet with no loss of speed. Would you conclude the tube had exerted no force on the bullet?

(But I get a smaller answer too.)

Edit: are you sure the bullet is initially moving horizontally?
 
Last edited:
Hey, thanks for the reply. Appreciate it.

I translated this problem from my native language, but yeah I'm not too sure either, but literally translated it means calculate the middle force of resistance, which I suppose means the average force of resistance, if we assume the force of friction getting lower the less momentum the bullet has, if that's how it works. I have to admit, I don't have a strong background in physics and have only started learning it a year ago, depending on what my course requires me.

I tried a different approach though, I treated the force of friction and the change in momentum as an impulse problem, calculated the time it took the bullet to end up from one side of the plate to the other, ie I calculated the contact time. And arrived at pretty much the same result I have already posted in my picture.

Regarding the entering angle of the velocity vector, it doesn't explicitly state that it's horizontal, but I can clearly see it in the picture I drew it from.

Also, there's a fair possibility that the solution provided by my teacher is wrong, since this is the case with a few other problems I've been assigned as well. But then again, usually the answers deviate by a few hundreds of Newtons sometimes, and not by a few orders of a magnitude like here, so that's what's getting me worked up.

I can't seem to get nowhere near his answer, assuming it's correct.
 
Deckname said:
I treated the force of friction and the change in momentum as an impulse problem, calculated the time it took the bullet to end up from one side of the plate to the other, ie I calculated the contact time.
That is the better approach, but as you say it only leads to 66000N, not 108N. Indeed, even if the bullet bounced straight back, causing a 5mm indent, all at constant speed, you would still not get to 108.

I wondered if your teacher had forgotten to square root somewhere, but that seems to give even larger numbers.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top