Resistor: Low Heat Capacity, Low TCR, Constant heat dissipation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a resistor that can quickly dissipate a constant amount of heat while maintaining low temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR). Users note that metal film and oxide resistors have high heat capacities, resulting in slow heat radiation, particularly at low wattages. Alternatives like infrared diodes and lamp filaments are suggested for generating consistent heat, with the latter being able to handle higher power without damage. The importance of warm-up time is questioned, with suggestions to use a shutter to delay exposure until the resistor reaches the desired temperature. Ultimately, the choice of resistor type should consider the specific heating requirements and radiation spectrum needed for calibration purposes.
marklv87
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am looking for a resistor that can dissipate a constant amount of heat at all temperatures immediately.

I have been using some metal film/oxide resistors, but it takes a very long time before the resistor starts radiating heat. I think the material making up the resistor has such a high heat capacity that it takes a very long time for it to completely heat up the material before it starts radiating the ambient air (especially at very low wattage like 1/2W).

Could anyone tell me what the best type of resistor to use for quickly generating a constant amount of heat, but also keeping a constant resistance (low TCR)?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The time something takes to heat up depends on its mass and specific heat and temperature differences or the power supplied if it is resistive heating.
Very small resistors with enough power going into them to behave like this would be destroyed in seconds.

If you just want infra red radiation, maybe you could look at infra red diodes?
 
Thanks. I actually a constant heat source for the calibration of a calorimeter. Do you have any ideas for something that produces a constant amount of heat and has a known wattage, besides a resistor?
 
What about a hefty lamp filament? They can get V hot without frazzling and can handle lots of watts. You'd have to control the voltage to give the appropriate temperature / resistance but that goes for any resistor over such a temperature range.

Why does the warm-up time bother you? You can always use a shutter to keep it away from the experiment until it's hot enough.

The surface temperature will be a function of power and surface area. I think you need to specify what you actually want in terms of the spectrum of the radiation before you can make a proper choice of resistor type and its value.
 
Kaye Instruments make calibration and validation equipment which I've used in the pharmaceutical industry. Here is a sweet http://www.kayeinc.com/validationproducts/drywell.htm" which is good for ±0.025°C.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Back
Top