Resistors in Series with a lightbulb

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the actual power consumed by a lightbulb marked "75W at 120V" when connected through an extension cord with resistances. The initial calculation found the total resistance, including the bulb and extension cord, to be 193.6Ω, leading to a power calculation of 74.4W. However, the correct approach requires recognizing that the voltage drop across the bulb is less than 120V due to the series resistance of the extension cord. The key takeaway is to apply voltage divider theory to determine the voltage across the bulb, which results in a power output of approximately 73.8W, aligning with the book's answer. Understanding the difference between total circuit power and power across individual components is crucial for accurate calculations.
sakebu
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A lightbulb marked "75W at 120V" is at one end of a long extension cord in which each of the two conductors has a resistance of 0.800Ω. The other end of the extension cord is plugged into a 120V outlet. Find the actual power of the bulb.


Homework Equations


P = V^2/ R
V = IR
P = I^2R

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer according to the book is 73.8W

I found the Resistance of the bulb to be 192Ω
by doing R = V^2/P R = 120^2/75 = 192Ω
Then I added on the TWO extra resistors .8 x 2 = 1.6Ω
The total resistance therefore becomes 193.6Ω
I used that along with the 120V to find the P.
120^2/193.6 = 74.4W ..

What am I doing wrong please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sakebu said:

Homework Statement


A lightbulb marked "75W at 120V" is at one end of a long extension cord in which each of the two conductors has a resistance of 0.800Ω. The other end of the extension cord is plugged into a 120V outlet. Find the actual power of the bulb.


Homework Equations


P = V^2/ R
V = IR
P = I^2R

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer according to the book is 73.8W

I found the Resistance of the bulb to be 192Ω
by doing R = V^2/P R = 120^2/75 = 192Ω
Then I added on the TWO extra resistors .8 x 2 = 1.6Ω
The total resistance therefore becomes 193.6Ω
I used that along with the 120V to find the P.
120^2/193.6 = 74.4W ..

What am I doing wrong please?
The power you calculated is the total power dissipated by the two wires and the bulb. The question asks for the power dissipated by the bulb alone. Do you know where to go from here?
 
I don't really understand the difference..
 
sakebu said:
I don't really understand the difference..

Just stick to the theory. P = IV where I is the current through the component and V is the voltage across it. What is the current through the light source? What is the voltage across it? It is never a good idea to memorize the set of power equations. They all come from P = IV, and you can always arrive to them yourself using a bit of thought and algebra. If you rely on these equations without understanding the theory well enough, you can (as you have done) mistakenly apply one of the equations improperly.

It's like how when I took physics AP, my teacher never even taught that silly kinematics equation v^2 = v_0^2 +2a(x-x_0). That too is derived from the other, more basic equations, a(t), v(t), and x(t).
 
Last edited:
sakebu said:
I don't really understand the difference..

That formula you quote P = V2/R - like Ohms law for that matter, have the symbol V in it.

That V stands for the Voltage Drop across the component you are dealing with.

Your circuit has 3 resistors in Series.

0.8, 192 and 0.8

The wire going TO the lamp, the lamp itself and the wire coming FROM the lamp.

The Voltage Drop across that group is 120V, but not all of it drops over the 192Ω lamp; it will be just a little bit less [use voltage divider theory] which will give you that slightly smaller Power.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top