Resistors that doesn't affect the others

  • Thread starter Thread starter stardust006
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an experiment involving resistors R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5, with R1 and R2 in series, R3 and R4 in series, and both pairs in parallel, while R5 is positioned between them. The participants clarify that R5 does not affect the overall resistance (RT) because it connects points with the same voltage, resulting in no current flow through it. The concept of a Wheatstone bridge is referenced to explain this phenomenon. Additionally, a minor typo in the Wikipedia article on Wheatstone bridges is noted. Understanding R5's role helps clarify its impact on the circuit's functionality.
stardust006
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
hello! we got this experiment,

R1= 46.8
R2= 46.8
R3= 148.9
R4= 147.7
R5= 217
RT= 71.1

as we can see, r1 and r2 are in series, while r3 and r4 are in series also and they are parallel to each other while r5 is on the middle, we got the RT by solving for r1,r2,r3 and r4.

and here's the question, we did not consider r5 but we got a right RT, what is the r5's work? what does it do on the connection? i am really confused. >.<
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not see a picture but from your expose I assume by R5 being in the middle you mean one end of R5 is connected to where R1 and R2 meet and the other end of R5 is connected to where R4 and R5 meet. If you then calculate the voltage at both ends of R5 you will see that it is the same and thus no current should be flowing through R5. Look up wheatstone bridge.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheatstone_bridge
Note that there is an typo in the wiki article - the first sentence after heading OPERATION should read "..., and resistance of Rx is adjustable."
 
Yes, thanks a lot! :)
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...

Similar threads

Back
Top