Resolution in scattering experiments

evilcman
Messages
40
Reaction score
2
Here are two exercises:

1. ) The proton radius is 0.8fm. What energy electron beam do you need for this resolution, if the target is liquid H2?

2.) A pion radius is 0,65fm. What energy pion beam do you need for this resolution by scattering on the electrons of a stationary target(pi-e scattering)? Why is the beam energy so different than in the previous exercise?

------

Now, i guess the main point in both cases is that the dr Broglie wavelength of the bombarding particle is the best resolution one can achieve. But, if I just go with de Broglie wavelength = spatial resolution , then I get approx. 1,5GeV and 1,9GeV respectively, which is not that different, so I don't understand the necessity of the last question. Also, I don't think the target material is important. Can someone clarify this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The common relation in electron scattering experiments is 197 MeV fermi =1, where MeV relates to the incident electron energy, and fermi is the spatial resolution.. (The proper units perhaps should be Mev/c fermi, i.e., Δp Δx = 197 MeV/c fermi). See equation 1.11 et seq. in

http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/mahgoub/My%20library/Advanced%20Quantum%20Field%20Theory.pdf

Bob S
 
That just mean that hbar c = 197 MeV fm, I know that, and it does not answer my question.
 
evilcman said:
That just mean that hbar c = 197 MeV fm, I know that, and it does not answer my question.
For pions, (pc)2 = E2 - (mc2)2

You probably need to transform to the center-of-mass (CM) reference frame. See Section 38.2 in

http://pdg.lbl.gov/2009/reviews/rpp2009-rev-kinematics.pdf

Bob S
 
Bob S said:
For pions, (pc)2 = E2 - (mc2)2

You probably need to transform to the center-of-mass (CM) reference frame. See Section 38.2 in

http://pdg.lbl.gov/2009/reviews/rpp2009-rev-kinematics.pdf

Bob S

Yes I know, but since for the pion bombarding I get pc = 1,9 GeV and m=140MeV
=> pc approx E

Now, if I have to transform to the C.M. frame (which is approximately the pion rest frame in this case) that may make a difference, but why should I do that?
 
evilcman said:
Now, if I have to transform to the C.M. frame (which is approximately the pion rest frame in this case) that may make a difference, but why should I do that?
The real physics is usually in the CM reference frame.

Bob S
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top