Resolving vectors into a unit vector

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on resolving vectors into a unit vector, specifically in the context of electric field polarization for an antenna. The unit vector along the antenna polarization is derived using the formula u_a = 1/Sqrt(2) (a_x + a_y), where 1/Sqrt(2) normalizes the vector's length to one. This normalization factor is calculated based on the magnitude of the vector formed by a_x and a_y. If a factor of 2 is added to a_y, it would alter the resultant unit vector, necessitating a recalculation of the normalization factor. Understanding these principles is essential for accurately defining unit vectors in vector addition contexts.
jmc
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


electric field polarization for a given antenna is expressed as:
E_i = (a_x + a_y) E (r, theta, phi)

The unit vector along the antenna polarization is found as u_a = 1/Sqrt(2) (a_x + a_y)2. Question
Where/how is the 1/Sqrt(2) found to resolve those other 2 vectors into a unit vector? Is there a formula or is it some kind of vector addition?
What if there was a factor of 2 added to a_y in the original equation - how would it change that unit vector result?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A unit vector is defined to have length one. Given any vector ##\vec v## it can be multiplied with ##N = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\vec v^2}}## to give a vector ##\frac{\vec v}{\sqrt{\vec v^2}}## which is of unit length.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top