Resonant Frequency and Air Column Length

  • Thread starter Thread starter garytse86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Column
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between air column length and resonant frequency. It is established that a longer air column results in a lower resonant frequency, producing a lower pitch sound, while a shorter column yields a higher frequency and pitch. Participants reference musical instruments to illustrate this concept, noting that larger instruments like tubas have longer tubes and produce lower frequencies. The fundamental frequency is confirmed to be inversely proportional to the length of the tube. Overall, a clear understanding of how air column length affects sound frequency is reached.
garytse86
Messages
311
Reaction score
0
Hi. The experiment is set up so that a loudspeaker is suspended oer a column of air. When sound is sent through the air column, the particls of air will vibrate. The amplitude is related to the loudness of the sound so when the particles vibrate at their maximum amplitude (resonance) the sound will be at its loudest.

Would you expect the resonant frequency to be higher or lower of the air-column was longer?

I would say the resonant frequency to be higher because the natural frequency of the air particles would be higher, is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
think about instruments. how much tube is there for a flute or a trumpet?how much tube is there for a trombone or a tuba? which is the bigger instrument: alto saxophone or bass saxophone?
/s
 
the longer the tube, the lower the pitch of sound, so lower frequency.
So, the short the air column, the higher the frequency. Is this right?
 
Last edited:
Can someone please help?
 
garytse86 said:
the longer the tube, the lower the pitch of sound, so lower frequency.
So, the short the air column, the higher the frequency. Is this right?
Right. The fundamental frequency is inversely proportional to the length of the tube.
 
Thanks Doc Al.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Difference between resonance in undamped vs damped mass-spring-dashpot
Replies
17
Views
2K
Measuring Speed of Sound with Resonance Tube Experiment
Replies
9
Views
5K
How does water affect resonance in organ pipes?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Physics behind the sound of guitars
Replies
23
Views
3K
Resonant Lengths in open air column question
Replies
6
Views
3K
Frequencies of fundamental standing waves
Replies
3
Views
2K
How Does the Wavelength Change at the Fourth Resonance in a Closed Air Column?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Tone produced in a partially filled bottle
Replies
2
Views
1K
Why Does Covering One End of a Pipe Change the Pitch of the Sound Produced?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Understanding MIT's applet on sound with Fourier coefficients
Replies
3
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top