Resultant Force Acting On Springs : Confused

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves two insulated metal rods connected by three identical springs, with a current of 20A flowing in opposing directions. The calculated force acting on each rod is 0.0036 N, resulting in a repulsive force between them. The key question is about the resultant force acting on each spring, which is clarified to be equal to the force exerted by one rod, not doubled. The equilibrium condition indicates that the spring pulls back with a force equal to the repulsive force from one rod, leading to a single extension value. This understanding resolves the confusion regarding the force calculations on the springs.
cyt91
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose we have 2 insulated metal rods each measuring 40 cm. Now,the 2 metal rods are connected with 3 identical springs each of length 20 cm (force constant 2.0 N/m) in parallel. A current of 20A is passed through each metal rod in opposing directions. What is the extension of each spring? The springs are initially not stretched.




Homework Equations


F=BIL

B= {\mu x I}/{2\pir}


The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the force acting on each metal rod to be 0.0036 N. The 2 metal rods repel each other since the current flowing through them is in opposite directions.

Now, my question is what is the resultant force acting on each spring? Is it 0.0012N or 0.0012 x 2 = 0.0024 N since there are 2 forces acting on each spring ; pulling each spring from the 2 ends ?

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
see this similar post: https://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-85739.html

It will actually just be 1xForce, look at it from the perspective of one of the rods. The rod is being pushed away by F Newtons, so, for equilibrium the spring must be pulling back with -F Newtons, and that -F comes from the extension of the spring... so the spring must be only extended by F, not 2xF. Thats pretty confusing, but does it make sense?
 
zhermes said:
see this similar post: https://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-85739.html

It will actually just be 1xForce, look at it from the perspective of one of the rods. The rod is being pushed away by F Newtons, so, for equilibrium the spring must be pulling back with -F Newtons, and that -F comes from the extension of the spring... so the spring must be only extended by F, not 2xF. Thats pretty confusing, but does it make sense?

Actually it makes a lot of sense. Thanks for pointing this out to me. :smile:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top