I Resulting force on a chamfered pneumatic piston

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the forces acting on a chamfered pneumatic piston, specifically how the chamfer affects the resulting force. It is established that the force on the piston is calculated using the formula F = P x a, where P is pressure and a is the area of the piston. The introduction of a chamfer increases the surface area but does not change the net downward force because the projected area remains the same. The conclusion is that the chamfer can effectively be ignored in calculations, as it does not alter the total force exerted by the pneumatic system. Overall, the impact of the chamfer on the force is negligible.
inkblotch
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
What happens to the resulting force in a pneumatic cylinder, if the piston inside were chamfered.
I was reading up on forces on hydraulic/pneumatic cylinders, and I've been thinking of this for a while:

So for a pneumatic cylinder, the force on the piston is simply:
P = F/a
F = P x a
where a = area of the piston that the air pressure is acting on.

So what would happen if the piston is chamfered, thus increasing the surface area?
pistons.png

See above, (red circles are o-rings). In a closed system, my guess is :
  1. The overall volume has increased, decreasing the pressure inside
  2. However, surface area is increased due to the chamfer
  3. Therefore the resulting downward force is the same.
Is this idea correct, or have I missed something?
Edit : The next step is, given the same air pressure, how could we estimate the increase in downward force?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The pressure acts normal to the surface, so the net effect of increased surface is zero (since only the downward component of pressure matters), and the product of downward component times area is the same as total pressure times projected area.
 
So it means the chamfer can just be ignored, since the projected area of the chamfer + the area of the flat surface is the same as just the area of the completely flat piston?
 
inkblotch said:
So it means the chamfer can just be ignored, since the projected area of the chamfer + the area of the flat surface is the same as just the area of the completely flat piston?
Yes
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top